Compare
Up to six funds side by side, and how much of each is the same portfolio as the others. Overlap is Σ min(weight) over the stocks both hold, from the latest disclosures.
Overlap
share of the portfolio the two funds hold in common
| Baroda BNP Paribas Large and Mid Cap | ICICI Prudential Large & Mid Cap | |
|---|---|---|
| Baroda BNP Paribas Large and Mid Cap | itself | 22% |
| ICICI Prudential Large & Mid Cap | 22% | itself |
Most alike: Baroda BNP Paribas Large and Mid Cap fund and ICICI Prudential Large & Mid Cap Fund share 22% of their portfolios. Two funds this different are doing different things; whether that is what you want is a separate question.
Side by side
record, cost, returns, drawdown, size
| Measure | Baroda BNP Paribas Large and Mid Cap | ICICI Prudential Large & Mid Cap |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Large & Mid Cap | Large & Mid Cap |
| Share of three-year stretches it beat its category P4 | 54% of 37 | 53% of 109 |
| Regular plan costs more than Direct by, a year P5 | 1.70% | 1.03% |
| Portfolio turned over a year P1 | 106% | 113% |
| Run by P7 | Sanjay Chawla · ≥ 1.8 yrs | Gaurav Jain · 3 mo |
| 1-year return | 2.8% | 0.8% |
| 3 years p.a. | 14.2% | 15.3% |
| 5 years p.a. | 12.4% | 14.9% |
| Deepest fall (max drawdown) | −19.5% | −14.8% |
| Assets (AUM) | ₹1,812 Cr | ₹33,351 Cr |
| Disclosed history | 3.3 yrs | 13 yrs |
| Holdings · top ten weight | 55 · 30% | 123 · 31% |
Funds in different categories are not comparable on returns — a category error is the first thing the postulates refuse to make. Compare each to its own category on its fund page.