Compare
Up to six funds side by side, and how much of each is the same portfolio as the others. Overlap is Σ min(weight) over the stocks both hold, from the latest disclosures.
Overlap
share of the portfolio the two funds hold in common
| UTI - Credit Risk Fund (Segregated - 07072020) | ICICI Prudential Credit Risk | |
|---|---|---|
| UTI - Credit Risk Fund (Segregated - 07072020) | itself | 0% |
| ICICI Prudential Credit Risk | 0% | itself |
Most alike: UTI - Credit Risk Fund (Segregated - 07072020) and ICICI Prudential Credit Risk Fund share 0% of their portfolios. Two funds this different are doing different things; whether that is what you want is a separate question.
Side by side
record, cost, returns, drawdown, size
| Measure | UTI - Credit Risk Fund (Segregated - 07072020) | ICICI Prudential Credit Risk |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Credit Risk | Credit Risk |
| Share of three-year stretches it beat its category P4 | not measured | 84% of 109 |
| Regular plan costs more than Direct by, a year P5 | not measured | 0.79% |
| Portfolio turned over a year P1 | not measured | not measured |
| Run by P7 | Abhishek Sonthalia · 10 mo | Manish Banthia · 9.8 yrs |
| 1-year return | — | 8.3% |
| 3 years p.a. | — | 9.1% |
| 5 years p.a. | — | 8.1% |
| Deepest fall (max drawdown) | not computed | −0.4% |
| Assets (AUM) | ₹254 Cr | ₹6,349 Cr |
| Disclosed history | — | 7.9 yrs |
| Holdings · top ten weight | — · — | 103 · 30% |
Funds in different categories are not comparable on returns — a category error is the first thing the postulates refuse to make. Compare each to its own category on its fund page.