Compare
Up to six funds side by side, and how much of each is the same portfolio as the others. Overlap is Σ min(weight) over the stocks both hold, from the latest disclosures. All 6,937 schemes are searchable — by scheme name, by fund house, or by the category you know them as.
4 of 6 chosen
Add another Small Cap fund — overlap says most about funds of one kind:
Overlap
share of the portfolio the two funds hold in common
| each fundagainst each other | BANDHAN Small Cap | HDFC Value | Tata Value | Nippon India Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BANDHAN Small CapSmall Cap | itself | BANDHAN Small Cap and HDFC Value share 10% of their portfolios | BANDHAN Small Cap and Tata Value share 3% of their portfolios | BANDHAN Small Cap and Nippon India Value share 10% of their portfolios |
| HDFC ValueValue | HDFC Value and BANDHAN Small Cap share 10% of their portfolios | itself | HDFC Value and Tata Value share 15% of their portfolios | HDFC Value and Nippon India Value share 34% of their portfolios |
| Tata ValueValue | Tata Value and BANDHAN Small Cap share 3% of their portfolios | Tata Value and HDFC Value share 15% of their portfolios | itself | Tata Value and Nippon India Value share 19% of their portfolios |
| Nippon India ValueValue | Nippon India Value and BANDHAN Small Cap share 10% of their portfolios | Nippon India Value and HDFC Value share 34% of their portfolios | Nippon India Value and Tata Value share 19% of their portfolios | itself |
Closest pair: HDFC Value Fund and Nippon India Value Fund share 34% of their portfolios. Most of what each of them holds, the other does not; whether two funds this far apart belong in one portfolio is a separate question.
Read a cell as: of everything the two funds hold, this much is the same holding at the same weight. It is symmetric — the pair above the diagonal and the pair below it are one number shown twice. A pair at 0% holds nothing in common, which is a real answer, and often the useful one.
Side by side
record, cost, returns, drawdown, size
| Measure | BANDHAN Small Cap | HDFC Value | Tata Value | Nippon India Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Category | Small Cap | Value | Value | Value |
| Fund house | Bandhan AMC Limited | HDFC Asset Management Company Limited | Tata Asset Management Limited | Nippon Life India Asset Management Limited |
| Share of three-year stretches it beat its category P4 | 75% of 44 | 53% of 109 | 63% of 109 | 93% of 109 |
| Regular plan costs more than Direct by, a year P5 | 2.00% points | 1.07% points | 1.15% points | 0.82% points |
| Portfolio turned over a year P1 | 68% | 54% | 81% | 82% |
| Run by P7 | Kirthi Jain · ≥ 2.8 yrs | not known | Sonam Udasi · ≥ 9 mo | Meenakshi Dawar · 8.3 yrs |
| 1-year return | 10.4% | 5.9% | 0.2% | −2.8% |
| 3 years p.a. | 25.3% | 16.2% | 12.9% | 14.0% |
| 5 years p.a. | 20.0% | 13.9% | 13.3% | 13.4% |
| Deepest fall (max drawdown) | −22.8% | −18.2% | −20.9% | −17.6% |
| Assets (AUM) | ₹31,103 Cr | ₹8,150 Cr | ₹8,440 Cr | ₹8,875 Cr |
| Disclosed history | 4.3 yrs | 10 mo | 11 yrs | 12 yrs |
| Holdings · top ten weight | 265 · 30% | 80 · 32% | 41 · 52% | 94 · 36% |
Funds in different categories are not comparable on returns — a category error is the first thing the postulates refuse to make. Compare each to its own category on its fund page.