Compare
Up to six funds side by side, and how much of each is the same portfolio as the others. Overlap is Σ min(weight) over the stocks both hold, from the latest disclosures. All 6,937 schemes are searchable — by scheme name, by fund house, or by the category you know them as.
3 of 6 chosen
Add another Small Cap fund — overlap says most about funds of one kind:
Overlap
share of the portfolio the two funds hold in common
| each fundagainst each other | BANDHAN Small Cap | ICICI Prudential Multi Cap | SBI SMALL CAP |
|---|---|---|---|
| BANDHAN Small CapSmall Cap | itself | BANDHAN Small Cap and ICICI Prudential Multi Cap share 9% of their portfolios | BANDHAN Small Cap and SBI SMALL CAP share 4% of their portfolios |
| ICICI Prudential Multi CapMulti Cap | ICICI Prudential Multi Cap and BANDHAN Small Cap share 9% of their portfolios | itself | ICICI Prudential Multi Cap and SBI SMALL CAP share 6% of their portfolios |
| SBI SMALL CAPSmall Cap | SBI SMALL CAP and BANDHAN Small Cap share 4% of their portfolios | SBI SMALL CAP and ICICI Prudential Multi Cap share 6% of their portfolios | itself |
No two of these hold much of the same portfolio. The closest pair, BANDHAN Small Cap Fund and ICICI Prudential Multi Cap Fund, share 9%. That is a number, not a resemblance: at this level the two funds are doing separate things, and nothing here says whether that is what you wanted.
Read a cell as: of everything the two funds hold, this much is the same holding at the same weight. It is symmetric — the pair above the diagonal and the pair below it are one number shown twice. A pair at 0% holds nothing in common, which is a real answer, and often the useful one.
Side by side
record, cost, returns, drawdown, size
| Measure | BANDHAN Small Cap | ICICI Prudential Multi Cap | SBI SMALL CAP |
|---|---|---|---|
| Category | Small Cap | Multi Cap | Small Cap |
| Fund house | Bandhan AMC Limited | ICICI Prudential Asset Management Company Limited | SBI Funds Management Limited |
| Share of three-year stretches it beat its category P4 | 75% of 44 | 49% of 109 | 49% of 109 |
| Regular plan costs more than Direct by, a year P5 | 2.00% points | 1.03% points | 1.31% points |
| Portfolio turned over a year P1 | 68% | 108% | 54% |
| Run by P7 | Kirthi Jain · ≥ 2.8 yrs | Lalit Kumar · 1.1 yrs | R Srinivasan · ≥ 3 mo |
| 1-year return | 10.4% | 6.8% | 6.6% |
| 3 years p.a. | 25.3% | 15.9% | 12.3% |
| 5 years p.a. | 20.0% | 15.0% | 14.2% |
| Deepest fall (max drawdown) | −22.8% | −17.3% | −22.4% |
| Assets (AUM) | ₹31,103 Cr | ₹19,305 Cr | ₹39,942 Cr |
| Disclosed history | 4.3 yrs | 11 yrs | 5.8 yrs |
| Holdings · top ten weight | 265 · 30% | 167 · 24% | 73 · 37% |
Funds in different categories are not comparable on returns — a category error is the first thing the postulates refuse to make. Compare each to its own category on its fund page.