Compare
Up to six funds side by side, and how much of each is the same portfolio as the others. Overlap is Σ min(weight) over the stocks both hold, from the latest disclosures.
Overlap
share of the portfolio the two funds hold in common
| Motilal Oswal Large and Midcap | Mirae Asset Large & Midcap | |
|---|---|---|
| Motilal Oswal Large and Midcap | itself | 7% |
| Mirae Asset Large & Midcap | 7% | itself |
Most alike: Motilal Oswal Large and Midcap Fund and Mirae Asset Large & Midcap Fund share 7% of their portfolios. Two funds this different are doing different things; whether that is what you want is a separate question.
Side by side
record, cost, returns, drawdown, size
| Measure | Motilal Oswal Large and Midcap | Mirae Asset Large & Midcap |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Large & Mid Cap | Large & Mid Cap |
| Share of three-year stretches it beat its category P4 | 94% of 48 | 63% of 109 |
| Regular plan costs more than Direct by, a year P5 | 1.71% | 1.08% |
| Portfolio turned over a year P1 | 100% | 83% |
| Run by P7 | Rakesh Shetty · 3.8 yrs | Neelesh Surana · 16 yrs |
| 1-year return | 7.3% | 2.6% |
| 3 years p.a. | 22.5% | 12.3% |
| 5 years p.a. | 19.2% | 10.8% |
| Deepest fall (max drawdown) | −26.1% | −19.5% |
| Assets (AUM) | ₹19,374 Cr | ₹44,748 Cr |
| Disclosed history | 6.9 yrs | 5.1 yrs |
| Holdings · top ten weight | 36 · 45% | 86 · 32% |
Funds in different categories are not comparable on returns — a category error is the first thing the postulates refuse to make. Compare each to its own category on its fund page.