Compare
Up to six funds side by side, and how much of each is the same portfolio as the others. Overlap is Σ min(weight) over the stocks both hold, from the latest disclosures.
Overlap
share of the portfolio the two funds hold in common
| ITI Arbitrage | ADITYA BIRLA SUN LIFE ARBITRAGE | |
|---|---|---|
| ITI Arbitrage | itself | 14% |
| ADITYA BIRLA SUN LIFE ARBITRAGE | 14% | itself |
Most alike: ITI Arbitrage Fund and ADITYA BIRLA SUN LIFE ARBITRAGE FUND share 14% of their portfolios. Two funds this different are doing different things; whether that is what you want is a separate question.
Side by side
record, cost, returns, drawdown, size
| Measure | ITI Arbitrage | ADITYA BIRLA SUN LIFE ARBITRAGE |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Arbitrage | Arbitrage |
| Share of three-year stretches it beat its category P4 | 14% of 49 | 100% of 109 |
| Regular plan costs more than Direct by, a year P5 | 0.78% | 0.68% |
| Portfolio turned over a year P1 | 152% | 86% |
| Run by P7 | Laukik Bagwe · 5 mo | Krina Mehta · ≥ 6 mo |
| 1-year return | 6.5% | 6.8% |
| 3 years p.a. | 7.3% | 7.5% |
| 5 years p.a. | 6.2% | 6.8% |
| Deepest fall (max drawdown) | −0.5% | −0.5% |
| Assets (AUM) | ₹68 Cr | ₹26,997 Cr |
| Disclosed history | 7.0 yrs | 8.3 yrs |
| Holdings · top ten weight | 32 · 69% | 208 · 35% |
Funds in different categories are not comparable on returns — a category error is the first thing the postulates refuse to make. Compare each to its own category on its fund page.