ANVESHAN Create account

Compare

Up to six funds side by side, and how much of each is the same portfolio as the others. Overlap is Σ min(weight) over the stocks both hold, from the latest disclosures. All 6,937 schemes are searchable — by scheme name, by fund house, or by the category you know them as.

4 of 6 chosen

  • Mirae Asset Midcap FundMid Cap×
  • Kotak Mid Cap FundMid Cap · no portfolio disclosed×
  • Axis Large Cap FundLarge Cap×
  • Nippon India Large Cap FundLarge Cap×

Overlap

share of the portfolio the two funds hold in common

each fundagainst each otherMirae Asset MidcapKotak Mid CapAxis Large CapNippon India Large Cap
Mirae Asset MidcapMid Cap
itself
Mirae Asset Midcap and Kotak Mid Cap: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Mid Cap
Mirae Asset Midcap and Axis Large Cap share 2% of their portfolios
Mirae Asset Midcap and Nippon India Large Cap share 11% of their portfolios
Kotak Mid CapMid Cap
Kotak Mid Cap and Mirae Asset Midcap: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Mid Cap
itself
Kotak Mid Cap and Axis Large Cap: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Mid Cap
Kotak Mid Cap and Nippon India Large Cap: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Mid Cap
Axis Large CapLarge Cap
Axis Large Cap and Mirae Asset Midcap share 2% of their portfolios
Axis Large Cap and Kotak Mid Cap: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Mid Cap
itself
Axis Large Cap and Nippon India Large Cap share 53% of their portfolios
Nippon India Large CapLarge Cap
Nippon India Large Cap and Mirae Asset Midcap share 11% of their portfolios
Nippon India Large Cap and Kotak Mid Cap: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Mid Cap
Nippon India Large Cap and Axis Large Cap share 53% of their portfolios
itself

Closest pair: Axis Large Cap Fund and Nippon India Large Cap Fund share 53% of their portfolios. Holding both is closer to holding one twice than to diversifying.

Kotak Mid Cap has no portfolio on file, so its row is blank rather than zero — that is an absence in our data, not a finding about the fund.

Read a cell as: of everything the two funds hold, this much is the same holding at the same weight. It is symmetric — the pair above the diagonal and the pair below it are one number shown twice. A pair at 0% holds nothing in common, which is a real answer, and often the useful one.

Side by side

record, cost, returns, drawdown, size

MeasureMirae Asset MidcapKotak Mid CapAxis Large CapNippon India Large Cap
CategoryMid CapMid CapLarge CapLarge Cap
Fund houseMirae Asset Investment Managers (India) Pvt. LtdKotak Mahindra Asset Management Company Limited.Axis Asset Management Co. Ltd.Nippon Life India Asset Management Limited
Share of three-year stretches it beat its category P441% of 5183% of 10947% of 10973% of 109
Regular plan costs more than Direct by, a year P51.55% points1.44% points1.21% points1.01% points
Portfolio turned over a year P189%not measured73%57%
Run by P7Ankit Jain · 7.2 yrsnot knownnot knownSailesh Raj Bhan · 19 yrs
1-year return9.1%4.8%−3.2%−4.7%
3 years p.a.16.4%18.1%9.2%11.1%
5 years p.a.15.8%16.8%5.8%12.8%
Deepest fall (max drawdown)−22.5%−20.9%−15.5%−15.4%
Assets (AUM)₹20,000 Cr₹64,136 Cr₹30,395 Cr₹52,344 Cr
Disclosed history5.1 yrs—5.9 yrs13 yrs
Holdings · top ten weight68 · 32%none disclosed49 · 48%69 · 45%

Funds in different categories are not comparable on returns — a category error is the first thing the postulates refuse to make. Compare each to its own category on its fund page.