ANVESHAN Create account

Compare

Up to six funds side by side, and how much of each is the same portfolio as the others. Overlap is Σ min(weight) over the stocks both hold, from the latest disclosures. All 6,937 schemes are searchable — by scheme name, by fund house, or by the category you know them as.

4 of 6 chosen

  • Mirae Asset Midcap FundMid Cap×
  • SBI Large Cap FundLarge Cap×
  • Nippon India Large Cap FundLarge Cap×
  • Kotak Mid Cap FundMid Cap · no portfolio disclosed×

Overlap

share of the portfolio the two funds hold in common

each fundagainst each otherMirae Asset MidcapSBI Large CapNippon India Large CapKotak Mid Cap
Mirae Asset MidcapMid Cap
itself
Mirae Asset Midcap and SBI Large Cap share 8% of their portfolios
Mirae Asset Midcap and Nippon India Large Cap share 11% of their portfolios
Mirae Asset Midcap and Kotak Mid Cap: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Mid Cap
SBI Large CapLarge Cap
SBI Large Cap and Mirae Asset Midcap share 8% of their portfolios
itself
SBI Large Cap and Nippon India Large Cap share 51% of their portfolios
SBI Large Cap and Kotak Mid Cap: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Mid Cap
Nippon India Large CapLarge Cap
Nippon India Large Cap and Mirae Asset Midcap share 11% of their portfolios
Nippon India Large Cap and SBI Large Cap share 51% of their portfolios
itself
Nippon India Large Cap and Kotak Mid Cap: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Mid Cap
Kotak Mid CapMid Cap
Kotak Mid Cap and Mirae Asset Midcap: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Mid Cap
Kotak Mid Cap and SBI Large Cap: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Mid Cap
Kotak Mid Cap and Nippon India Large Cap: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Mid Cap
itself

Closest pair: SBI Large Cap Fund and Nippon India Large Cap Fund share 51% of their portfolios. Holding both is closer to holding one twice than to diversifying.

Kotak Mid Cap has no portfolio on file, so its row is blank rather than zero — that is an absence in our data, not a finding about the fund.

Read a cell as: of everything the two funds hold, this much is the same holding at the same weight. It is symmetric — the pair above the diagonal and the pair below it are one number shown twice. A pair at 0% holds nothing in common, which is a real answer, and often the useful one.

Side by side

record, cost, returns, drawdown, size

MeasureMirae Asset MidcapSBI Large CapNippon India Large CapKotak Mid Cap
CategoryMid CapLarge CapLarge CapMid Cap
Fund houseMirae Asset Investment Managers (India) Pvt. LtdSBI Funds Management LimitedNippon Life India Asset Management LimitedKotak Mahindra Asset Management Company Limited.
Share of three-year stretches it beat its category P441% of 5145% of 10973% of 10983% of 109
Regular plan costs more than Direct by, a year P51.55% points0.93% points1.01% points1.44% points
Portfolio turned over a year P189%59%57%not measured
Run by P7Ankit Jain · 7.2 yrsSaurabh Pant · ≥ 3 moSailesh Raj Bhan · 19 yrsnot known
1-year return9.1%−1.6%−4.7%4.8%
3 years p.a.16.4%9.2%11.1%18.1%
5 years p.a.15.8%9.0%12.8%16.8%
Deepest fall (max drawdown)−22.5%−15.4%−15.4%−20.9%
Assets (AUM)₹20,000 Cr₹55,417 Cr₹52,344 Cr₹64,136 Cr
Disclosed history5.1 yrs5.8 yrs13 yrs—
Holdings · top ten weight68 · 32%57 · 47%69 · 45%none disclosed

Funds in different categories are not comparable on returns — a category error is the first thing the postulates refuse to make. Compare each to its own category on its fund page.