Compare
Up to six funds side by side, and how much of each is the same portfolio as the others. Overlap is Σ min(weight) over the stocks both hold, from the latest disclosures. All 6,937 schemes are searchable — by scheme name, by fund house, or by the category you know them as.
4 of 6 chosen
Add another Mid Cap fund — overlap says most about funds of one kind:
Overlap
share of the portfolio the two funds hold in common
| each fundagainst each other | Mirae Asset Midcap | Tata Value | Bandhan Value | Motilal Oswal Midcap |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mirae Asset MidcapMid Cap | itself | Mirae Asset Midcap and Tata Value share 11% of their portfolios | Mirae Asset Midcap and Bandhan Value share 6% of their portfolios | Mirae Asset Midcap and Motilal Oswal Midcap share 21% of their portfolios |
| Tata ValueValue | Tata Value and Mirae Asset Midcap share 11% of their portfolios | itself | Tata Value and Bandhan Value share 20% of their portfolios | Tata Value and Motilal Oswal Midcap share 12% of their portfolios |
| Bandhan ValueValue | Bandhan Value and Mirae Asset Midcap share 6% of their portfolios | Bandhan Value and Tata Value share 20% of their portfolios | itself | Bandhan Value and Motilal Oswal Midcap share 4% of their portfolios |
| Motilal Oswal MidcapMid Cap | Motilal Oswal Midcap and Mirae Asset Midcap share 21% of their portfolios | Motilal Oswal Midcap and Tata Value share 12% of their portfolios | Motilal Oswal Midcap and Bandhan Value share 4% of their portfolios | itself |
Closest pair: Mirae Asset Midcap Fund and Motilal Oswal Midcap Fund share 21% of their portfolios. Most of what each of them holds, the other does not; whether two funds this far apart belong in one portfolio is a separate question.
Read a cell as: of everything the two funds hold, this much is the same holding at the same weight. It is symmetric — the pair above the diagonal and the pair below it are one number shown twice. A pair at 0% holds nothing in common, which is a real answer, and often the useful one.
Side by side
record, cost, returns, drawdown, size
| Measure | Mirae Asset Midcap | Tata Value | Bandhan Value | Motilal Oswal Midcap |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Category | Mid Cap | Value | Value | Mid Cap |
| Fund house | Mirae Asset Investment Managers (India) Pvt. Ltd | Tata Asset Management Limited | Bandhan AMC Limited | Motilal Oswal Asset Management Company Limited |
| Share of three-year stretches it beat its category P4 | 41% of 51 | 63% of 109 | 67% of 109 | 54% of 109 |
| Regular plan costs more than Direct by, a year P5 | 1.55% points | 1.15% points | 1.17% points | 1.37% points |
| Portfolio turned over a year P1 | 89% | 81% | 68% | 92% |
| Run by P7 | Ankit Jain · 7.2 yrs | Sonam Udasi · ≥ 9 mo | Daylynn Pinto · ≥ 3.5 yrs | Rakesh Shetty · 3.8 yrs |
| 1-year return | 9.1% | 0.2% | −1.1% | −0.5% |
| 3 years p.a. | 16.4% | 12.9% | 10.4% | 19.5% |
| 5 years p.a. | 15.8% | 13.3% | 12.8% | 21.1% |
| Deepest fall (max drawdown) | −22.5% | −20.9% | −17.9% | −28.9% |
| Assets (AUM) | ₹20,000 Cr | ₹8,440 Cr | ₹10,051 Cr | ₹41,706 Cr |
| Disclosed history | 5.1 yrs | 11 yrs | 4.9 yrs | 4.0 yrs |
| Holdings · top ten weight | 68 · 32% | 41 · 52% | 68 · 47% | 32 · 54% |
Funds in different categories are not comparable on returns — a category error is the first thing the postulates refuse to make. Compare each to its own category on its fund page.