Compare
Up to six funds side by side, and how much of each is the same portfolio as the others. Overlap is Σ min(weight) over the stocks both hold, from the latest disclosures. All 6,937 schemes are searchable — by scheme name, by fund house, or by the category you know them as.
3 of 6 chosen
Add another Mid Cap fund — overlap says most about funds of one kind:
Overlap
share of the portfolio the two funds hold in common
| each fundagainst each other | Mirae Asset Midcap | UTI - Flexi Cap Fund. | HDFC Mid Cap |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mirae Asset MidcapMid Cap | itself | Mirae Asset Midcap and UTI - Flexi Cap Fund. share 9% of their portfolios | Mirae Asset Midcap and HDFC Mid Cap share 21% of their portfolios |
| UTI - Flexi Cap Fund.Flexi Cap | UTI - Flexi Cap Fund. and Mirae Asset Midcap share 9% of their portfolios | itself | UTI - Flexi Cap Fund. and HDFC Mid Cap share 12% of their portfolios |
| HDFC Mid CapMid Cap | HDFC Mid Cap and Mirae Asset Midcap share 21% of their portfolios | HDFC Mid Cap and UTI - Flexi Cap Fund. share 12% of their portfolios | itself |
Closest pair: Mirae Asset Midcap Fund and HDFC Mid Cap Fund share 21% of their portfolios. Most of what each of them holds, the other does not; whether two funds this far apart belong in one portfolio is a separate question.
Read a cell as: of everything the two funds hold, this much is the same holding at the same weight. It is symmetric — the pair above the diagonal and the pair below it are one number shown twice. A pair at 0% holds nothing in common, which is a real answer, and often the useful one.
Side by side
record, cost, returns, drawdown, size
| Measure | Mirae Asset Midcap | UTI - Flexi Cap Fund. | HDFC Mid Cap |
|---|---|---|---|
| Category | Mid Cap | Flexi Cap | Mid Cap |
| Fund house | Mirae Asset Investment Managers (India) Pvt. Ltd | UTI Asset Mgmt. Co. Ltd. | HDFC Asset Management Company Limited |
| Share of three-year stretches it beat its category P4 | 41% of 51 | 40% of 109 | 66% of 109 |
| Regular plan costs more than Direct by, a year P5 | 1.55% points | 0.68% points | 0.92% points |
| Portfolio turned over a year P1 | 89% | 41% | 38% |
| Run by P7 | Ankit Jain · 7.2 yrs | Ajay Tyagi · 11 yrs | not known |
| 1-year return | 9.1% | −2.3% | 6.6% |
| 3 years p.a. | 16.4% | 8.4% | 17.6% |
| 5 years p.a. | 15.8% | 4.9% | 18.9% |
| Deepest fall (max drawdown) | −22.5% | −20.1% | −16.8% |
| Assets (AUM) | ₹20,000 Cr | ₹23,434 Cr | ₹1.07 lakh Cr |
| Disclosed history | 5.1 yrs | 12 yrs | 10 mo |
| Holdings · top ten weight | 68 · 32% | 62 · 44% | 81 · 37% |
Funds in different categories are not comparable on returns — a category error is the first thing the postulates refuse to make. Compare each to its own category on its fund page.