Compare
Up to six funds side by side, and how much of each is the same portfolio as the others. Overlap is Σ min(weight) over the stocks both hold, from the latest disclosures. All 6,937 schemes are searchable — by scheme name, by fund house, or by the category you know them as.
4 of 6 chosen
The largest fund in each of these kinds, to start from — or search above:
Overlap
share of the portfolio the two funds hold in common
| each fundagainst each other | Tata Corporate Bond Fund Segregated Portfolio 1 Direct Plan | ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund) | HDFC Mid Cap | ICICI Prudential Large Cap Fund (erstwhile Bluechip Fund) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tata Corporate Bond Fund Segregated Portfolio 1 Direct PlanUncategorised | itself | Tata Corporate Bond Fund Segregated Portfolio 1 Direct Plan and ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund): no portfolio disclosed for Tata Corporate Bond Fund Segregated Portfolio 1 Direct Plan | Tata Corporate Bond Fund Segregated Portfolio 1 Direct Plan and HDFC Mid Cap: no portfolio disclosed for Tata Corporate Bond Fund Segregated Portfolio 1 Direct Plan | Tata Corporate Bond Fund Segregated Portfolio 1 Direct Plan and ICICI Prudential Large Cap Fund (erstwhile Bluechip Fund): no portfolio disclosed for Tata Corporate Bond Fund Segregated Portfolio 1 Direct Plan |
| ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund)Value | ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund) and Tata Corporate Bond Fund Segregated Portfolio 1 Direct Plan: no portfolio disclosed for Tata Corporate Bond Fund Segregated Portfolio 1 Direct Plan | itself | ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund) and HDFC Mid Cap share 5% of their portfolios | ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund) and ICICI Prudential Large Cap Fund (erstwhile Bluechip Fund) share 60% of their portfolios |
| HDFC Mid CapMid Cap | HDFC Mid Cap and Tata Corporate Bond Fund Segregated Portfolio 1 Direct Plan: no portfolio disclosed for Tata Corporate Bond Fund Segregated Portfolio 1 Direct Plan | HDFC Mid Cap and ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund) share 5% of their portfolios | itself | HDFC Mid Cap and ICICI Prudential Large Cap Fund (erstwhile Bluechip Fund) share 4% of their portfolios |
| ICICI Prudential Large Cap Fund (erstwhile Bluechip Fund)Large Cap | ICICI Prudential Large Cap Fund (erstwhile Bluechip Fund) and Tata Corporate Bond Fund Segregated Portfolio 1 Direct Plan: no portfolio disclosed for Tata Corporate Bond Fund Segregated Portfolio 1 Direct Plan | ICICI Prudential Large Cap Fund (erstwhile Bluechip Fund) and ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund) share 60% of their portfolios | ICICI Prudential Large Cap Fund (erstwhile Bluechip Fund) and HDFC Mid Cap share 4% of their portfolios | itself |
Closest pair: ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund) and ICICI Prudential Large Cap Fund (erstwhile Bluechip Fund) share 60% of their portfolios. Holding both is closer to holding one twice than to diversifying.
Tata Corporate Bond Fund Segregated Portfolio 1 Direct Plan has no portfolio on file, so its row is blank rather than zero — that is an absence in our data, not a finding about the fund.
Read a cell as: of everything the two funds hold, this much is the same holding at the same weight. It is symmetric — the pair above the diagonal and the pair below it are one number shown twice. A pair at 0% holds nothing in common, which is a real answer, and often the useful one.
Side by side
record, cost, returns, drawdown, size
| Measure | Tata Corporate Bond Fund Segregated Portfolio 1 Direct Plan | ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund) | HDFC Mid Cap | ICICI Prudential Large Cap Fund (erstwhile Bluechip Fund) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Category | Uncategorised | Value | Mid Cap | Large Cap |
| Fund house | Tata Asset Management Limited | ICICI Prudential Asset Management Company Limited | HDFC Asset Management Company Limited | ICICI Prudential Asset Management Company Limited |
| Share of three-year stretches it beat its category P4 | not measured | 68% of 109 | 66% of 109 | 90% of 109 |
| Regular plan costs more than Direct by, a year P5 | not measured | 0.83% points | 0.92% points | 0.81% points |
| Portfolio turned over a year P1 | not measured | 58% | 38% | 45% |
| Run by P7 | not known | Dharmesh Kakkad · 5.7 yrs | not known | Vaibhav Dusad · 5.7 yrs |
| 1-year return | 111.8% | −5.4% | 6.6% | −5.3% |
| 3 years p.a. | — | 11.5% | 17.6% | 10.6% |
| 5 years p.a. | — | 13.5% | 18.9% | 10.9% |
| Deepest fall (max drawdown) | not computed | −14.0% | −16.8% | −15.4% |
| Assets (AUM) | ₹0 Cr | ₹60,800 Cr | ₹1.07 lakh Cr | ₹80,822 Cr |
| Disclosed history | — | 13 yrs | 10 mo | 13 yrs |
| Holdings · top ten weight | none disclosed | 66 · 52% | 81 · 37% | 93 · 47% |
Funds in different categories are not comparable on returns — a category error is the first thing the postulates refuse to make. Compare each to its own category on its fund page.