Compare
Up to six funds side by side, and how much of each is the same portfolio as the others. Overlap is Σ min(weight) over the stocks both hold, from the latest disclosures. All 6,937 schemes are searchable — by scheme name, by fund house, or by the category you know them as.
3 of 6 chosen
Add another Sectoral/ Thematic fund — overlap says most about funds of one kind:
Overlap
share of the portfolio the two funds hold in common
| each fundagainst each other | DSP Quant | ICICI Prudential Business Cycle | HDFC Defence |
|---|---|---|---|
| DSP QuantSectoral/ Thematic | itself | DSP Quant and ICICI Prudential Business Cycle share 17% of their portfolios | DSP Quant and HDFC Defence share 5% of their portfolios |
| ICICI Prudential Business CycleSectoral/ Thematic | ICICI Prudential Business Cycle and DSP Quant share 17% of their portfolios | itself | ICICI Prudential Business Cycle and HDFC Defence share 2% of their portfolios |
| HDFC DefenceSectoral/ Thematic | HDFC Defence and DSP Quant share 5% of their portfolios | HDFC Defence and ICICI Prudential Business Cycle share 2% of their portfolios | itself |
Closest pair: DSP Quant Fund and ICICI Prudential Business Cycle Fund share 17% of their portfolios. Most of what each of them holds, the other does not; whether two funds this far apart belong in one portfolio is a separate question.
Read a cell as: of everything the two funds hold, this much is the same holding at the same weight. It is symmetric — the pair above the diagonal and the pair below it are one number shown twice. A pair at 0% holds nothing in common, which is a real answer, and often the useful one.
Side by side
record, cost, returns, drawdown, size
| Measure | DSP Quant | ICICI Prudential Business Cycle | HDFC Defence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Category | Sectoral/ Thematic | Sectoral/ Thematic | Sectoral/ Thematic |
| Fund house | DSP Asset Managers Private Limited | ICICI Prudential Asset Management Company Limited | HDFC Asset Management Company Limited |
| Share of three-year stretches it beat its category P4 | 4% of 52 | 100% of 33 | 100% of 4 |
| Regular plan costs more than Direct by, a year P5 | 0.81% points | 1.36% points | 1.53% points |
| Portfolio turned over a year P1 | 86% | 52% | 59% |
| Run by P7 | Aparna Karnik · ≥ 1.2 yrs | Manish Banthia · 5.7 yrs | not known |
| 1-year return | −3.2% | −3.9% | 22.4% |
| 3 years p.a. | 6.9% | 14.8% | 38.2% |
| 5 years p.a. | 4.7% | 14.9% | — |
| Deepest fall (max drawdown) | −19.9% | −14.4% | −34.5% |
| Assets (AUM) | ₹775 Cr | ₹16,090 Cr | ₹11,252 Cr |
| Disclosed history | 7.2 yrs | 5.7 yrs | 2.4 yrs |
| Holdings · top ten weight | 43 · 34% | 88 · 51% | 26 · 80% |
Funds in different categories are not comparable on returns — a category error is the first thing the postulates refuse to make. Compare each to its own category on its fund page.