Compare
Up to six funds side by side, and how much of each is the same portfolio as the others. Overlap is Σ min(weight) over the stocks both hold, from the latest disclosures.
Overlap
share of the portfolio the two funds hold in common
| ICICI Prudential Retirement Fund Pure Equity Plan | HDFC Retirement Fund - Equity Plan | |
|---|---|---|
| ICICI Prudential Retirement Fund Pure Equity Plan | itself | 26% |
| HDFC Retirement Fund - Equity Plan | 26% | itself |
Most alike: ICICI Prudential Retirement Fund Pure Equity Plan and HDFC Retirement Fund - Equity Plan share 26% of their portfolios. Two funds this different are doing different things; whether that is what you want is a separate question.
Side by side
record, cost, returns, drawdown, size
| Measure | ICICI Prudential Retirement Fund Pure Equity Plan | HDFC Retirement Fund - Equity Plan |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Retirement | Retirement |
| Share of three-year stretches it beat its category P4 | 100% of 56 | 85% of 92 |
| Regular plan costs more than Direct by, a year P5 | 1.77% | 1.50% |
| Portfolio turned over a year P1 | 91% | not measured |
| Run by P7 | Rohit Lakhotia · 3.3 yrs | not known |
| 1-year return | 6.8% | −5.3% |
| 3 years p.a. | 20.3% | 9.4% |
| 5 years p.a. | 19.1% | 12.0% |
| Deepest fall (max drawdown) | −16.9% | −16.1% |
| Assets (AUM) | ₹2,150 Cr | ₹7,026 Cr |
| Disclosed history | 7.3 yrs | 1 mo |
| Holdings · top ten weight | 91 · 32% | 74 · 44% |
Funds in different categories are not comparable on returns — a category error is the first thing the postulates refuse to make. Compare each to its own category on its fund page.