Compare
Up to six funds side by side, and how much of each is the same portfolio as the others. Overlap is Σ min(weight) over the stocks both hold, from the latest disclosures.
Overlap
share of the portfolio the two funds hold in common
| Edelweiss Small Cap | SBI SMALL CAP | |
|---|---|---|
| Edelweiss Small Cap | itself | 0% |
| SBI SMALL CAP | 0% | itself |
Most alike: Edelweiss Small Cap Fund and SBI SMALL CAP FUND share 0% of their portfolios. Two funds this different are doing different things; whether that is what you want is a separate question.
Side by side
record, cost, returns, drawdown, size
| Measure | Edelweiss Small Cap | SBI SMALL CAP |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Small Cap | Small Cap |
| Share of three-year stretches it beat its category P4 | 98% of 56 | 49% of 109 |
| Regular plan costs more than Direct by, a year P5 | 1.88% | 1.31% |
| Portfolio turned over a year P1 | not measured | 54% |
| Run by P7 | not known | R Srinivasan · ≥ 3 mo |
| 1-year return | 8.7% | 6.6% |
| 3 years p.a. | 16.2% | 12.3% |
| 5 years p.a. | 17.2% | 14.2% |
| Deepest fall (max drawdown) | −22.9% | −22.4% |
| Assets (AUM) | ₹6,048 Cr | ₹39,942 Cr |
| Disclosed history | — | 5.8 yrs |
| Holdings · top ten weight | — · — | 73 · 37% |
Funds in different categories are not comparable on returns — a category error is the first thing the postulates refuse to make. Compare each to its own category on its fund page.