Compare
Up to six funds side by side, and how much of each is the same portfolio as the others. Overlap is Σ min(weight) over the stocks both hold, from the latest disclosures.
Overlap
share of the portfolio the two funds hold in common
| WhiteOak Capital Liquid | ICICI Prudential Liquid | |
|---|---|---|
| WhiteOak Capital Liquid | itself | 11% |
| ICICI Prudential Liquid | 11% | itself |
Most alike: WhiteOak Capital Liquid Fund and ICICI Prudential Liquid Fund share 11% of their portfolios. Two funds this different are doing different things; whether that is what you want is a separate question.
Side by side
record, cost, returns, drawdown, size
| Measure | WhiteOak Capital Liquid | ICICI Prudential Liquid |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Liquid | Liquid |
| Share of three-year stretches it beat its category P4 | 0% of 57 | 59% of 109 |
| Regular plan costs more than Direct by, a year P5 | 0.10% | 0.09% |
| Portfolio turned over a year P1 | not measured | not measured |
| Run by P7 | Piyush Baranwal · 5.5 yrs | Darshil Dedhia · 3.3 yrs |
| 1-year return | 6.4% | 6.5% |
| 3 years p.a. | 6.9% | 7.0% |
| 5 years p.a. | 6.2% | 6.4% |
| Deepest fall (max drawdown) | 0.0% | −0.0% |
| Assets (AUM) | ₹706 Cr | ₹65,311 Cr |
| Disclosed history | 2.9 yrs | 6.3 yrs |
| Holdings · top ten weight | 30 · 48% | 173 · 23% |
Funds in different categories are not comparable on returns — a category error is the first thing the postulates refuse to make. Compare each to its own category on its fund page.