Compare
Up to six funds side by side, and how much of each is the same portfolio as the others. Overlap is Σ min(weight) over the stocks both hold, from the latest disclosures. All 6,937 schemes are searchable — by scheme name, by fund house, or by the category you know them as.
3 of 6 chosen
Add another Overnight fund — overlap says most about funds of one kind:
Overlap
share of the portfolio the two funds hold in common
| each fundagainst each other | Nippon India Overnight | ICICI Prudential Overnight | SBI OVERNIGHT |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nippon India OvernightOvernight | itself | Nippon India Overnight and ICICI Prudential Overnight share 3% of their portfolios | Nippon India Overnight and SBI OVERNIGHT share 2% of their portfolios |
| ICICI Prudential OvernightOvernight | ICICI Prudential Overnight and Nippon India Overnight share 3% of their portfolios | itself | ICICI Prudential Overnight and SBI OVERNIGHT share 2% of their portfolios |
| SBI OVERNIGHTOvernight | SBI OVERNIGHT and Nippon India Overnight share 2% of their portfolios | SBI OVERNIGHT and ICICI Prudential Overnight share 2% of their portfolios | itself |
No two of these hold much of the same portfolio. The closest pair, Nippon India Overnight Fund and ICICI Prudential Overnight Fund, share 3%. That is a number, not a resemblance: at this level the two funds are doing separate things, and nothing here says whether that is what you wanted.
Read a cell as: of everything the two funds hold, this much is the same holding at the same weight. It is symmetric — the pair above the diagonal and the pair below it are one number shown twice. A pair at 0% holds nothing in common, which is a real answer, and often the useful one.
Side by side
record, cost, returns, drawdown, size
| Measure | Nippon India Overnight | ICICI Prudential Overnight | SBI OVERNIGHT |
|---|---|---|---|
| Category | Overnight | Overnight | Overnight |
| Fund house | Nippon Life India Asset Management Limited | ICICI Prudential Asset Management Company Limited | SBI Funds Management Limited |
| Share of three-year stretches it beat its category P4 | 100% of 58 | 63% of 59 | 17% of 109 |
| Regular plan costs more than Direct by, a year P5 | 0.10% points | 0.12% points | 0.10% points |
| Portfolio turned over a year P1 | not measured | not measured | not measured |
| Run by P7 | Vikash Agarwal · 1.3 yrs | Darshil Dedhia · 3.3 yrs | Ranjhana Gupta · 3 mo |
| 1-year return | 5.3% | 5.3% | 5.2% |
| 3 years p.a. | 6.1% | 6.1% | 6.0% |
| 5 years p.a. | 5.8% | 68.0% | 5.7% |
| Deepest fall (max drawdown) | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Assets (AUM) | ₹8,152 Cr | ₹14,826 Cr | ₹29,876 Cr |
| Disclosed history | 7.0 yrs | 7.5 yrs | 5.8 yrs |
| Holdings · top ten weight | 12 · 101% | 7 · 100% | 12 · 100% |
Funds in different categories are not comparable on returns — a category error is the first thing the postulates refuse to make. Compare each to its own category on its fund page.