Compare
Up to six funds side by side, and how much of each is the same portfolio as the others. Overlap is Σ min(weight) over the stocks both hold, from the latest disclosures.
Overlap
share of the portfolio the two funds hold in common
| Tata Arbitrage | ICICI Prudential Arbitrage | |
|---|---|---|
| Tata Arbitrage | itself | -0% |
| ICICI Prudential Arbitrage | -0% | itself |
Most alike: Tata Arbitrage Fund and ICICI Prudential Arbitrage Fund share -0% of their portfolios. Two funds this different are doing different things; whether that is what you want is a separate question.
Side by side
record, cost, returns, drawdown, size
| Measure | Tata Arbitrage | ICICI Prudential Arbitrage |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Arbitrage | Arbitrage |
| Share of three-year stretches it beat its category P4 | 100% of 58 | 100% of 109 |
| Regular plan costs more than Direct by, a year P5 | 0.82% | 0.60% |
| Portfolio turned over a year P1 | 263% | 128% |
| Run by P7 | Sailesh Jain · ≥ 1.3 yrs | Nikhil Kabra · 5.8 yrs |
| 1-year return | 6.8% | 6.7% |
| 3 years p.a. | 7.5% | 7.3% |
| 5 years p.a. | 6.9% | 6.7% |
| Deepest fall (max drawdown) | −0.4% | −0.4% |
| Assets (AUM) | ₹24,426 Cr | ₹34,536 Cr |
| Disclosed history | 1.3 yrs | 10 yrs |
| Holdings · top ten weight | 212 · 52% | 205 · 41% |
Funds in different categories are not comparable on returns — a category error is the first thing the postulates refuse to make. Compare each to its own category on its fund page.