Compare
Up to six funds side by side, and how much of each is the same portfolio as the others. Overlap is Σ min(weight) over the stocks both hold, from the latest disclosures.
Overlap
share of the portfolio the two funds hold in common
| UTI Floating Interest Rates | Nippon India Floating Interest Rates | |
|---|---|---|
| UTI Floating Interest Rates | itself | 6% |
| Nippon India Floating Interest Rates | 6% | itself |
Most alike: UTI Floating Interest Rates Fund and Nippon India Floating Interest Rates Fund share 6% of their portfolios. Two funds this different are doing different things; whether that is what you want is a separate question.
Side by side
record, cost, returns, drawdown, size
| Measure | UTI Floating Interest Rates | Nippon India Floating Interest Rates |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Floating Interest Rates | Floating Interest Rates |
| Share of three-year stretches it beat its category P4 | 0% of 60 | 50% of 109 |
| Regular plan costs more than Direct by, a year P5 | 0.68% | 0.40% |
| Portfolio turned over a year P1 | not measured | not measured |
| Run by P7 | Pankaj Pathak · 1.4 yrs | Vikash Agarwal · 1.9 yrs |
| 1-year return | 6.3% | 5.6% |
| 3 years p.a. | 7.1% | 7.4% |
| 5 years p.a. | 6.3% | 6.6% |
| Deepest fall (max drawdown) | −0.3% | −0.5% |
| Assets (AUM) | ₹1,145 Cr | ₹7,577 Cr |
| Disclosed history | 7.9 yrs | 13 yrs |
| Holdings · top ten weight | 44 · 45% | 122 · 27% |
Funds in different categories are not comparable on returns — a category error is the first thing the postulates refuse to make. Compare each to its own category on its fund page.