Compare
Up to six funds side by side, and how much of each is the same portfolio as the others. Overlap is Σ min(weight) over the stocks both hold, from the latest disclosures. All 6,937 schemes are searchable — by scheme name, by fund house, or by the category you know them as.
3 of 6 chosen
The largest fund in each of these kinds, to start from — or search above:
Overlap
share of the portfolio the two funds hold in common
| each fundagainst each other | Tata Fixed Maturity Plan Series 56 Scheme A | ICICI Prudential Large Cap Fund (erstwhile Bluechip Fund) | Nippon India Small Cap |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tata Fixed Maturity Plan Series 56 Scheme AUncategorised | itself | Tata Fixed Maturity Plan Series 56 Scheme A and ICICI Prudential Large Cap Fund (erstwhile Bluechip Fund) share 0% of their portfolios | Tata Fixed Maturity Plan Series 56 Scheme A and Nippon India Small Cap share 0% of their portfolios |
| ICICI Prudential Large Cap Fund (erstwhile Bluechip Fund)Large Cap | ICICI Prudential Large Cap Fund (erstwhile Bluechip Fund) and Tata Fixed Maturity Plan Series 56 Scheme A share 0% of their portfolios | itself | ICICI Prudential Large Cap Fund (erstwhile Bluechip Fund) and Nippon India Small Cap share 8% of their portfolios |
| Nippon India Small CapSmall Cap | Nippon India Small Cap and Tata Fixed Maturity Plan Series 56 Scheme A share 0% of their portfolios | Nippon India Small Cap and ICICI Prudential Large Cap Fund (erstwhile Bluechip Fund) share 8% of their portfolios | itself |
No two of these hold much of the same portfolio. The closest pair, ICICI Prudential Large Cap Fund (erstwhile Bluechip Fund) and Nippon India Small Cap Fund, share 8%. That is a number, not a resemblance: at this level the two funds are doing separate things, and nothing here says whether that is what you wanted.
Read a cell as: of everything the two funds hold, this much is the same holding at the same weight. It is symmetric — the pair above the diagonal and the pair below it are one number shown twice. A pair at 0% holds nothing in common, which is a real answer, and often the useful one.
Side by side
record, cost, returns, drawdown, size
| Measure | Tata Fixed Maturity Plan Series 56 Scheme A | ICICI Prudential Large Cap Fund (erstwhile Bluechip Fund) | Nippon India Small Cap |
|---|---|---|---|
| Category | Uncategorised | Large Cap | Small Cap |
| Fund house | Tata Asset Management Limited | ICICI Prudential Asset Management Company Limited | Nippon Life India Asset Management Limited |
| Share of three-year stretches it beat its category P4 | not measured | 90% of 109 | 90% of 109 |
| Regular plan costs more than Direct by, a year P5 | not measured | 0.81% points | 1.10% points |
| Portfolio turned over a year P1 | not measured | 45% | 68% |
| Run by P7 | not known | Vaibhav Dusad · 5.7 yrs | Samir Rachh · 9.6 yrs |
| 1-year return | 4.0% | −5.3% | 8.9% |
| 3 years p.a. | 8.3% | 10.6% | 16.1% |
| 5 years p.a. | — | 10.9% | 19.0% |
| Deepest fall (max drawdown) | not computed | −15.4% | −24.2% |
| Assets (AUM) | ₹13 Cr | ₹80,822 Cr | ₹76,236 Cr |
| Disclosed history | 3.0 yrs | 13 yrs | 14 yrs |
| Holdings · top ten weight | 7 · 100% | 93 · 47% | 257 · 16% |
Funds in different categories are not comparable on returns — a category error is the first thing the postulates refuse to make. Compare each to its own category on its fund page.