Compare
Up to six funds side by side, and how much of each is the same portfolio as the others. Overlap is Σ min(weight) over the stocks both hold, from the latest disclosures. All 6,937 schemes are searchable — by scheme name, by fund house, or by the category you know them as.
5 of 6 chosen
The largest fund in each of these kinds, to start from — or search above:
Overlap
share of the portfolio the two funds hold in common
| each fundagainst each other | TATA Fixed Maturity Plan Series 55 Sch A | HDFC Mid Cap | Nippon India Small Cap | Nippon India Multi Cap | Parag Parikh Flexi Cap |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TATA Fixed Maturity Plan Series 55 Sch AUncategorised | itself | TATA Fixed Maturity Plan Series 55 Sch A and HDFC Mid Cap: no portfolio disclosed for TATA Fixed Maturity Plan Series 55 Sch A | TATA Fixed Maturity Plan Series 55 Sch A and Nippon India Small Cap: no portfolio disclosed for TATA Fixed Maturity Plan Series 55 Sch A | TATA Fixed Maturity Plan Series 55 Sch A and Nippon India Multi Cap: no portfolio disclosed for TATA Fixed Maturity Plan Series 55 Sch A | TATA Fixed Maturity Plan Series 55 Sch A and Parag Parikh Flexi Cap: no portfolio disclosed for TATA Fixed Maturity Plan Series 55 Sch A |
| HDFC Mid CapMid Cap | HDFC Mid Cap and TATA Fixed Maturity Plan Series 55 Sch A: no portfolio disclosed for TATA Fixed Maturity Plan Series 55 Sch A | itself | HDFC Mid Cap and Nippon India Small Cap share 11% of their portfolios | HDFC Mid Cap and Nippon India Multi Cap share 13% of their portfolios | HDFC Mid Cap and Parag Parikh Flexi Cap share 1% of their portfolios |
| Nippon India Small CapSmall Cap | Nippon India Small Cap and TATA Fixed Maturity Plan Series 55 Sch A: no portfolio disclosed for TATA Fixed Maturity Plan Series 55 Sch A | Nippon India Small Cap and HDFC Mid Cap share 11% of their portfolios | itself | Nippon India Small Cap and Nippon India Multi Cap share 20% of their portfolios | Nippon India Small Cap and Parag Parikh Flexi Cap share 6% of their portfolios |
| Nippon India Multi CapMulti Cap | Nippon India Multi Cap and TATA Fixed Maturity Plan Series 55 Sch A: no portfolio disclosed for TATA Fixed Maturity Plan Series 55 Sch A | Nippon India Multi Cap and HDFC Mid Cap share 13% of their portfolios | Nippon India Multi Cap and Nippon India Small Cap share 20% of their portfolios | itself | Nippon India Multi Cap and Parag Parikh Flexi Cap share 23% of their portfolios |
| Parag Parikh Flexi CapFlexi Cap | Parag Parikh Flexi Cap and TATA Fixed Maturity Plan Series 55 Sch A: no portfolio disclosed for TATA Fixed Maturity Plan Series 55 Sch A | Parag Parikh Flexi Cap and HDFC Mid Cap share 1% of their portfolios | Parag Parikh Flexi Cap and Nippon India Small Cap share 6% of their portfolios | Parag Parikh Flexi Cap and Nippon India Multi Cap share 23% of their portfolios | itself |
Closest pair: Nippon India Multi Cap Fund and Parag Parikh Flexi Cap Fund share 23% of their portfolios. Most of what each of them holds, the other does not; whether two funds this far apart belong in one portfolio is a separate question.
TATA Fixed Maturity Plan Series 55 Sch A has no portfolio on file, so its row is blank rather than zero — that is an absence in our data, not a finding about the fund.
Read a cell as: of everything the two funds hold, this much is the same holding at the same weight. It is symmetric — the pair above the diagonal and the pair below it are one number shown twice. A pair at 0% holds nothing in common, which is a real answer, and often the useful one.
Side by side
record, cost, returns, drawdown, size
| Measure | TATA Fixed Maturity Plan Series 55 Sch A | HDFC Mid Cap | Nippon India Small Cap | Nippon India Multi Cap | Parag Parikh Flexi Cap |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Category | Uncategorised | Mid Cap | Small Cap | Multi Cap | Flexi Cap |
| Fund house | Tata Asset Management Limited | HDFC Asset Management Company Limited | Nippon Life India Asset Management Limited | Nippon Life India Asset Management Limited | PPFAS Asset Management Pvt. Ltd. |
| Share of three-year stretches it beat its category P4 | not measured | 66% of 109 | 90% of 109 | 50% of 109 | 91% of 109 |
| Regular plan costs more than Direct by, a year P5 | not measured | 0.92% points | 1.10% points | 0.84% points | 0.84% points |
| Portfolio turned over a year P1 | not measured | 38% | 68% | 66% | 29% |
| Run by P7 | not known | not known | Samir Rachh · 9.6 yrs | Sailesh Raj Bhan · 21 yrs | Rajeev Thakkar · 13 yrs |
| 1-year return | 3.6% | 6.6% | 8.9% | −1.4% | −5.1% |
| 3 years p.a. | 8.2% | 17.6% | 16.1% | 13.5% | 12.8% |
| 5 years p.a. | — | 18.9% | 19.0% | 16.4% | 11.5% |
| Deepest fall (max drawdown) | not computed | −16.8% | −24.2% | −18.6% | −11.0% |
| Assets (AUM) | ₹0 Cr | ₹1.07 lakh Cr | ₹76,236 Cr | ₹53,760 Cr | ₹1.46 lakh Cr |
| Disclosed history | — | 10 mo | 14 yrs | 14 yrs | 5.0 yrs |
| Holdings · top ten weight | none disclosed | 81 · 37% | 257 · 16% | 123 · 29% | 116 · 52% |
Funds in different categories are not comparable on returns — a category error is the first thing the postulates refuse to make. Compare each to its own category on its fund page.