Compare
Up to six funds side by side, and how much of each is the same portfolio as the others. Overlap is Σ min(weight) over the stocks both hold, from the latest disclosures.
Overlap
share of the portfolio the two funds hold in common
| Nippon India Nivesh Lakshya Long Term | ICICI Prudential Long Term | |
|---|---|---|
| Nippon India Nivesh Lakshya Long Term | itself | 0% |
| ICICI Prudential Long Term | 0% | itself |
Most alike: Nippon India Nivesh Lakshya Long Term Fund and ICICI Prudential Long Term Fund share 0% of their portfolios. Two funds this different are doing different things; whether that is what you want is a separate question.
Side by side
record, cost, returns, drawdown, size
| Measure | Nippon India Nivesh Lakshya Long Term | ICICI Prudential Long Term |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Long Term | Long Term |
| Share of three-year stretches it beat its category P4 | 79% of 14 | 100% of 14 |
| Regular plan costs more than Direct by, a year P5 | 0.34% | 0.70% |
| Portfolio turned over a year P1 | not measured | not measured |
| Run by P7 | Pranay Sinha · 5.4 yrs | Manish Banthia · 2.7 yrs |
| 1-year return | 2.3% | 2.8% |
| 3 years p.a. | 6.1% | 6.5% |
| 5 years p.a. | 5.6% | 5.4% |
| Deepest fall (max drawdown) | −5.1% | −3.8% |
| Assets (AUM) | ₹6,547 Cr | ₹843 Cr |
| Disclosed history | 7.0 yrs | 1 mo |
| Holdings · top ten weight | 19 · 98% | 21 · 87% |
Funds in different categories are not comparable on returns — a category error is the first thing the postulates refuse to make. Compare each to its own category on its fund page.