Compare
Up to six funds side by side, and how much of each is the same portfolio as the others. Overlap is Σ min(weight) over the stocks both hold, from the latest disclosures.
Overlap
share of the portfolio the two funds hold in common
| Baroda BNP Paribas Ultra Short Term | Nippon India Ultra Short Term | |
|---|---|---|
| Baroda BNP Paribas Ultra Short Term | itself | 4% |
| Nippon India Ultra Short Term | 4% | itself |
Most alike: Baroda BNP Paribas Ultra Short Term Fund and Nippon India Ultra Short Term Fund share 4% of their portfolios. Two funds this different are doing different things; whether that is what you want is a separate question.
Side by side
record, cost, returns, drawdown, size
| Measure | Baroda BNP Paribas Ultra Short Term | Nippon India Ultra Short Term |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Ultra Short Term | Ultra Short Term |
| Share of three-year stretches it beat its category P4 | 63% of 64 | 80% of 65 |
| Regular plan costs more than Direct by, a year P5 | 0.19% | 0.82% |
| Portfolio turned over a year P1 | not measured | not measured |
| Run by P7 | Gurvinder Singh · ≥ 1.8 yrs | Vivek Sharma · 13 yrs |
| 1-year return | 6.6% | 7.0% |
| 3 years p.a. | 7.2% | 7.6% |
| 5 years p.a. | 6.7% | 7.0% |
| Deepest fall (max drawdown) | −0.1% | −0.1% |
| Assets (AUM) | ₹679 Cr | ₹10,656 Cr |
| Disclosed history | 3.3 yrs | 7.0 yrs |
| Holdings · top ten weight | 35 · 47% | 136 · 26% |
Funds in different categories are not comparable on returns — a category error is the first thing the postulates refuse to make. Compare each to its own category on its fund page.