Compare
Up to six funds side by side, and how much of each is the same portfolio as the others. Overlap is Σ min(weight) over the stocks both hold, from the latest disclosures.
Overlap
share of the portfolio the two funds hold in common
| Navi Aggressive Hybrid | ICICI Prudential Aggressive Hybrid | |
|---|---|---|
| Navi Aggressive Hybrid | itself | 17% |
| ICICI Prudential Aggressive Hybrid | 17% | itself |
Most alike: Navi Aggressive Hybrid Fund and ICICI Prudential Aggressive Hybrid Fund share 17% of their portfolios. Two funds this different are doing different things; whether that is what you want is a separate question.
Side by side
record, cost, returns, drawdown, size
| Measure | Navi Aggressive Hybrid | ICICI Prudential Aggressive Hybrid |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Aggressive Hybrid | Aggressive Hybrid |
| Share of three-year stretches it beat its category P4 | 8% of 65 | 90% of 109 |
| Regular plan costs more than Direct by, a year P5 | 2.00% | 0.93% |
| Portfolio turned over a year P1 | 71% | 54% |
| Run by P7 | Tanmay Sethi · 2.5 yrs | Manish Banthia · 13 yrs |
| 1-year return | 8.3% | 0.2% |
| 3 years p.a. | 12.6% | 13.3% |
| 5 years p.a. | 11.6% | 14.1% |
| Deepest fall (max drawdown) | −12.5% | −11.2% |
| Assets (AUM) | ₹114 Cr | ₹52,683 Cr |
| Disclosed history | 3.2 yrs | 13 yrs |
| Holdings · top ten weight | 67 · 40% | 254 · 37% |
Funds in different categories are not comparable on returns — a category error is the first thing the postulates refuse to make. Compare each to its own category on its fund page.