ANVESHAN Create account

Compare

Up to six funds side by side, and how much of each is the same portfolio as the others. Overlap is Σ min(weight) over the stocks both hold, from the latest disclosures. All 6,937 schemes are searchable — by scheme name, by fund house, or by the category you know them as.

Overlap

share of the portfolio the two funds hold in common

each fundagainst each otherIDFC Fixed Term Plan Series 140 Regular Plan-PeriodicNippon India Small Cap
IDFC Fixed Term Plan Series 140 Regular Plan-PeriodicUncategorised
itself
IDFC Fixed Term Plan Series 140 Regular Plan-Periodic and Nippon India Small Cap: no portfolio disclosed for IDFC Fixed Term Plan Series 140 Regular Plan-Periodic
Nippon India Small CapSmall Cap
Nippon India Small Cap and IDFC Fixed Term Plan Series 140 Regular Plan-Periodic: no portfolio disclosed for IDFC Fixed Term Plan Series 140 Regular Plan-Periodic
itself

IDFC Fixed Term Plan Series 140 Regular Plan-Periodic has no portfolio on file, so its row is blank rather than zero — that is an absence in our data, not a finding about the fund.

Side by side

record, cost, returns, drawdown, size

MeasureIDFC Fixed Term Plan Series 140 Regular Plan-PeriodicNippon India Small Cap
CategoryUncategorisedSmall Cap
Fund houseBandhan AMC LimitedNippon Life India Asset Management Limited
Share of three-year stretches it beat its category P4not measured90% of 109
Regular plan costs more than Direct by, a year P5not measured1.10% points
Portfolio turned over a year P1not measured68%
Run by P7not knownSamir Rachh · 9.6 yrs
1-year return−1.8%8.9%
3 years p.a.0.1%16.1%
5 years p.a.—19.0%
Deepest fall (max drawdown)not computed−24.2%
Assets (AUM)₹0 Cr₹76,236 Cr
Disclosed history—14 yrs
Holdings · top ten weightnone disclosed257 · 16%

Funds in different categories are not comparable on returns — a category error is the first thing the postulates refuse to make. Compare each to its own category on its fund page.