Compare
Up to six funds side by side, and how much of each is the same portfolio as the others. Overlap is Σ min(weight) over the stocks both hold, from the latest disclosures.
Overlap
share of the portfolio the two funds hold in common
| ICICI Prudential Nifty 100 Low Volatility 30 ETF | Nippon India ETF Nifty 50 BeES | |
|---|---|---|
| ICICI Prudential Nifty 100 Low Volatility 30 ETF | itself | 49% |
| Nippon India ETF Nifty 50 BeES | 49% | itself |
Most alike: ICICI Prudential Nifty 100 Low Volatility 30 ETF and Nippon India ETF Nifty 50 BeES share 49% of their portfolios. Two funds this different are doing different things; whether that is what you want is a separate question.
Side by side
record, cost, returns, drawdown, size
| Measure | ICICI Prudential Nifty 100 Low Volatility 30 ETF | Nippon India ETF Nifty 50 BeES |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Other ETFs | Other ETFs |
| Share of three-year stretches it beat its category P4 | 28% of 75 | 10% of 83 |
| Regular plan costs more than Direct by, a year P5 | not measured | not measured |
| Portfolio turned over a year P1 | 48% | 32% |
| Run by P7 | Nishit Patel · 5.7 yrs | Himanshu Mange · 2.7 yrs |
| 1-year return | −4.7% | −6.1% |
| 3 years p.a. | −49.2% | 7.0% |
| 5 years p.a. | −31.7% | 7.1% |
| Deepest fall (max drawdown) | −90.3% | −15.4% |
| Assets (AUM) | ₹3,473 Cr | ₹64,129 Cr |
| Disclosed history | 8.7 yrs | 9.8 yrs |
| Holdings · top ten weight | 32 · 37% | 53 · 53% |
Funds in different categories are not comparable on returns — a category error is the first thing the postulates refuse to make. Compare each to its own category on its fund page.