Compare
Up to six funds side by side, and how much of each is the same portfolio as the others. Overlap is Σ min(weight) over the stocks both hold, from the latest disclosures. All 6,937 schemes are searchable — by scheme name, by fund house, or by the category you know them as.
3 of 6 chosen
Add another Multi Cap fund — overlap says most about funds of one kind:
Overlap
share of the portfolio the two funds hold in common
| each fundagainst each other | Mahindra Manulife Multi Cap | BANDHAN Small Cap | HDFC Small Cap |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mahindra Manulife Multi CapMulti Cap | itself | Mahindra Manulife Multi Cap and BANDHAN Small Cap share 9% of their portfolios | Mahindra Manulife Multi Cap and HDFC Small Cap share 1% of their portfolios |
| BANDHAN Small CapSmall Cap | BANDHAN Small Cap and Mahindra Manulife Multi Cap share 9% of their portfolios | itself | BANDHAN Small Cap and HDFC Small Cap share 6% of their portfolios |
| HDFC Small CapSmall Cap | HDFC Small Cap and Mahindra Manulife Multi Cap share 1% of their portfolios | HDFC Small Cap and BANDHAN Small Cap share 6% of their portfolios | itself |
No two of these hold much of the same portfolio. The closest pair, Mahindra Manulife Multi Cap Fund and BANDHAN Small Cap Fund, share 9%. That is a number, not a resemblance: at this level the two funds are doing separate things, and nothing here says whether that is what you wanted.
Read a cell as: of everything the two funds hold, this much is the same holding at the same weight. It is symmetric — the pair above the diagonal and the pair below it are one number shown twice. A pair at 0% holds nothing in common, which is a real answer, and often the useful one.
Side by side
record, cost, returns, drawdown, size
| Measure | Mahindra Manulife Multi Cap | BANDHAN Small Cap | HDFC Small Cap |
|---|---|---|---|
| Category | Multi Cap | Small Cap | Small Cap |
| Fund house | Mahindra Manulife Investment Management Pvt Ltd | Bandhan AMC Limited | HDFC Asset Management Company Limited |
| Share of three-year stretches it beat its category P4 | 99% of 77 | 75% of 44 | 63% of 109 |
| Regular plan costs more than Direct by, a year P5 | 2.04% points | 2.00% points | 1.25% points |
| Portfolio turned over a year P1 | 151% | 68% | 46% |
| Run by P7 | Vishal Jajoo · 10 mo | Kirthi Jain · ≥ 2.8 yrs | not known |
| 1-year return | 12.5% | 10.4% | −2.6% |
| 3 years p.a. | 17.9% | 25.3% | 11.3% |
| 5 years p.a. | 16.0% | 20.0% | 14.8% |
| Deepest fall (max drawdown) | −20.2% | −22.8% | −22.6% |
| Assets (AUM) | ₹7,471 Cr | ₹31,103 Cr | ₹42,162 Cr |
| Disclosed history | 9.4 yrs | 4.3 yrs | 2.4 yrs |
| Holdings · top ten weight | 73 · 38% | 265 · 30% | 87 · 35% |
Funds in different categories are not comparable on returns — a category error is the first thing the postulates refuse to make. Compare each to its own category on its fund page.