Compare
Up to six funds side by side, and how much of each is the same portfolio as the others. Overlap is Σ min(weight) over the stocks both hold, from the latest disclosures. All 6,937 schemes are searchable — by scheme name, by fund house, or by the category you know them as.
3 of 6 chosen
Add another Multi Cap fund — overlap says most about funds of one kind:
Overlap
share of the portfolio the two funds hold in common
| each fundagainst each other | Mahindra Manulife Multi Cap | Motilal Oswal Midcap | DSP Midcap |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mahindra Manulife Multi CapMulti Cap | itself | Mahindra Manulife Multi Cap and Motilal Oswal Midcap share 9% of their portfolios | Mahindra Manulife Multi Cap and DSP Midcap share 17% of their portfolios |
| Motilal Oswal MidcapMid Cap | Motilal Oswal Midcap and Mahindra Manulife Multi Cap share 9% of their portfolios | itself | Motilal Oswal Midcap and DSP Midcap share 22% of their portfolios |
| DSP MidcapMid Cap | DSP Midcap and Mahindra Manulife Multi Cap share 17% of their portfolios | DSP Midcap and Motilal Oswal Midcap share 22% of their portfolios | itself |
Closest pair: Motilal Oswal Midcap Fund and DSP Midcap Fund share 22% of their portfolios. Most of what each of them holds, the other does not; whether two funds this far apart belong in one portfolio is a separate question.
Read a cell as: of everything the two funds hold, this much is the same holding at the same weight. It is symmetric — the pair above the diagonal and the pair below it are one number shown twice. A pair at 0% holds nothing in common, which is a real answer, and often the useful one.
Side by side
record, cost, returns, drawdown, size
| Measure | Mahindra Manulife Multi Cap | Motilal Oswal Midcap | DSP Midcap |
|---|---|---|---|
| Category | Multi Cap | Mid Cap | Mid Cap |
| Fund house | Mahindra Manulife Investment Management Pvt Ltd | Motilal Oswal Asset Management Company Limited | DSP Asset Managers Private Limited |
| Share of three-year stretches it beat its category P4 | 99% of 77 | 54% of 109 | 43% of 109 |
| Regular plan costs more than Direct by, a year P5 | 2.04% points | 1.37% points | 1.02% points |
| Portfolio turned over a year P1 | 151% | 92% | 56% |
| Run by P7 | Vishal Jajoo · 10 mo | Rakesh Shetty · 3.8 yrs | Vinit Sambre · ≥ 1.2 yrs |
| 1-year return | 12.5% | −0.5% | 3.6% |
| 3 years p.a. | 17.9% | 19.5% | 14.6% |
| 5 years p.a. | 16.0% | 21.1% | 11.8% |
| Deepest fall (max drawdown) | −20.2% | −28.9% | −21.2% |
| Assets (AUM) | ₹7,471 Cr | ₹41,706 Cr | ₹20,871 Cr |
| Disclosed history | 9.4 yrs | 4.0 yrs | 13 yrs |
| Holdings · top ten weight | 73 · 38% | 32 · 54% | 66 · 30% |
Funds in different categories are not comparable on returns — a category error is the first thing the postulates refuse to make. Compare each to its own category on its fund page.