Compare
Up to six funds side by side, and how much of each is the same portfolio as the others. Overlap is Σ min(weight) over the stocks both hold, from the latest disclosures.
Overlap
share of the portfolio the two funds hold in common
| Mahindra Manulife Multi Cap | Nippon India Multi Cap | |
|---|---|---|
| Mahindra Manulife Multi Cap | itself | 17% |
| Nippon India Multi Cap | 17% | itself |
Most alike: Mahindra Manulife Multi Cap Fund and Nippon India Multi Cap Fund share 17% of their portfolios. Two funds this different are doing different things; whether that is what you want is a separate question.
Side by side
record, cost, returns, drawdown, size
| Measure | Mahindra Manulife Multi Cap | Nippon India Multi Cap |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Multi Cap | Multi Cap |
| Share of three-year stretches it beat its category P4 | 99% of 77 | 50% of 109 |
| Regular plan costs more than Direct by, a year P5 | 2.04% | 0.84% |
| Portfolio turned over a year P1 | 151% | 66% |
| Run by P7 | Vishal Jajoo · 10 mo | Sailesh Raj Bhan · 21 yrs |
| 1-year return | 12.5% | −1.4% |
| 3 years p.a. | 17.9% | 13.5% |
| 5 years p.a. | 16.0% | 16.4% |
| Deepest fall (max drawdown) | −20.2% | −18.6% |
| Assets (AUM) | ₹7,471 Cr | ₹53,760 Cr |
| Disclosed history | 9.4 yrs | 14 yrs |
| Holdings · top ten weight | 73 · 38% | 123 · 29% |
Funds in different categories are not comparable on returns — a category error is the first thing the postulates refuse to make. Compare each to its own category on its fund page.