Compare
Up to six funds side by side, and how much of each is the same portfolio as the others. Overlap is Σ min(weight) over the stocks both hold, from the latest disclosures. All 6,937 schemes are searchable — by scheme name, by fund house, or by the category you know them as.
3 of 6 chosen
Add another Multi Cap fund — overlap says most about funds of one kind:
Overlap
share of the portfolio the two funds hold in common
| each fundagainst each other | Mahindra Manulife Multi Cap | Quant Small Cap | SBI SMALL CAP |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mahindra Manulife Multi CapMulti Cap | itself | Mahindra Manulife Multi Cap and Quant Small Cap share 8% of their portfolios | Mahindra Manulife Multi Cap and SBI SMALL CAP share 2% of their portfolios |
| Quant Small CapSmall Cap | Quant Small Cap and Mahindra Manulife Multi Cap share 8% of their portfolios | itself | Quant Small Cap and SBI SMALL CAP share 3% of their portfolios |
| SBI SMALL CAPSmall Cap | SBI SMALL CAP and Mahindra Manulife Multi Cap share 2% of their portfolios | SBI SMALL CAP and Quant Small Cap share 3% of their portfolios | itself |
No two of these hold much of the same portfolio. The closest pair, Mahindra Manulife Multi Cap Fund and Quant Small Cap Fund, share 8%. That is a number, not a resemblance: at this level the two funds are doing separate things, and nothing here says whether that is what you wanted.
Read a cell as: of everything the two funds hold, this much is the same holding at the same weight. It is symmetric — the pair above the diagonal and the pair below it are one number shown twice. A pair at 0% holds nothing in common, which is a real answer, and often the useful one.
Side by side
record, cost, returns, drawdown, size
| Measure | Mahindra Manulife Multi Cap | Quant Small Cap | SBI SMALL CAP |
|---|---|---|---|
| Category | Multi Cap | Small Cap | Small Cap |
| Fund house | Mahindra Manulife Investment Management Pvt Ltd | quant Money Managers Limited | SBI Funds Management Limited |
| Share of three-year stretches it beat its category P4 | 99% of 77 | 69% of 109 | 49% of 109 |
| Regular plan costs more than Direct by, a year P5 | 2.04% points | 0.84% points | 1.31% points |
| Portfolio turned over a year P1 | 151% | 75% | 54% |
| Run by P7 | Vishal Jajoo · 10 mo | Ankit Pande · ≥ 2.5 yrs | R Srinivasan · ≥ 3 mo |
| 1-year return | 12.5% | 12.7% | 6.6% |
| 3 years p.a. | 17.9% | 18.5% | 12.3% |
| 5 years p.a. | 16.0% | 19.2% | 14.2% |
| Deepest fall (max drawdown) | −20.2% | −24.4% | −22.4% |
| Assets (AUM) | ₹7,471 Cr | ₹34,069 Cr | ₹39,942 Cr |
| Disclosed history | 9.4 yrs | 7.5 yrs | 5.8 yrs |
| Holdings · top ten weight | 73 · 38% | 120 · 43% | 73 · 37% |
Funds in different categories are not comparable on returns — a category error is the first thing the postulates refuse to make. Compare each to its own category on its fund page.