Compare
Up to six funds side by side, and how much of each is the same portfolio as the others. Overlap is Σ min(weight) over the stocks both hold, from the latest disclosures.
Overlap
share of the portfolio the two funds hold in common
| Mirae Asset Dynamic Term | Kotak Dynamic Term | |
|---|---|---|
| Mirae Asset Dynamic Term | itself | 0% |
| Kotak Dynamic Term | 0% | itself |
Most alike: Mirae Asset Dynamic Term Fund and Kotak Dynamic Term Fund share 0% of their portfolios. Two funds this different are doing different things; whether that is what you want is a separate question.
Side by side
record, cost, returns, drawdown, size
| Measure | Mirae Asset Dynamic Term | Kotak Dynamic Term |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Dynamic Term | Dynamic Term |
| Share of three-year stretches it beat its category P4 | 39% of 79 | 99% of 109 |
| Regular plan costs more than Direct by, a year P5 | 1.11% | 0.78% |
| Portfolio turned over a year P1 | not measured | not measured |
| Run by P7 | Basant Bafna@ · 9 mo | not known |
| 1-year return | 5.0% | 6.5% |
| 3 years p.a. | 7.0% | 7.9% |
| 5 years p.a. | 5.8% | 6.7% |
| Deepest fall (max drawdown) | −1.2% | −2.4% |
| Assets (AUM) | ₹116 Cr | ₹2,409 Cr |
| Disclosed history | 5.1 yrs | — |
| Holdings · top ten weight | 11 · 99% | — · — |
Funds in different categories are not comparable on returns — a category error is the first thing the postulates refuse to make. Compare each to its own category on its fund page.