Compare
Up to six funds side by side, and how much of each is the same portfolio as the others. Overlap is Σ min(weight) over the stocks both hold, from the latest disclosures.
Overlap
share of the portfolio the two funds hold in common
| Edelweiss Equity Savings | ICICI Prudential Equity Savings | |
|---|---|---|
| Edelweiss Equity Savings | itself | 0% |
| ICICI Prudential Equity Savings | 0% | itself |
Most alike: Edelweiss Equity Savings Fund and ICICI Prudential Equity Savings Fund share 0% of their portfolios. Two funds this different are doing different things; whether that is what you want is a separate question.
Side by side
record, cost, returns, drawdown, size
| Measure | Edelweiss Equity Savings | ICICI Prudential Equity Savings |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Equity Savings | Equity Savings |
| Share of three-year stretches it beat its category P4 | 98% of 83 | 42% of 106 |
| Regular plan costs more than Direct by, a year P5 | 1.14% | 0.70% |
| Portfolio turned over a year P1 | not measured | 54% |
| Run by P7 | not known | Manish Banthia · 12 yrs |
| 1-year return | 7.7% | 2.6% |
| 3 years p.a. | 11.4% | 6.8% |
| 5 years p.a. | 9.6% | 7.4% |
| Deepest fall (max drawdown) | −3.5% | −3.1% |
| Assets (AUM) | ₹1,344 Cr | ₹15,983 Cr |
| Disclosed history | — | 11 yrs |
| Holdings · top ten weight | — · — | 145 · 47% |
Funds in different categories are not comparable on returns — a category error is the first thing the postulates refuse to make. Compare each to its own category on its fund page.