ANVESHAN Create account

Compare

Up to six funds side by side, and how much of each is the same portfolio as the others. Overlap is Σ min(weight) over the stocks both hold, from the latest disclosures. All 6,937 schemes are searchable — by scheme name, by fund house, or by the category you know them as.

4 of 6 chosen

  • Edelweiss Greater China Equity Off-shore FundFoF Overseas · no portfolio disclosed×
  • Edelweiss US Technology Equity Fund of FundFoF Overseas · no portfolio disclosed×
  • HDFC Developed World Overseas Equity Passive FOFFoF Overseas×
  • Axis Greater China Equity Fund of FundFoF Overseas×

Overlap

share of the portfolio the two funds hold in common

each fundagainst each otherEdelweiss Greater China Equity Off-shoreEdelweiss US Technology Equity Fund ofHDFC Developed World Overseas Equity Passive FOFAxis Greater China Equity Fund of
Edelweiss Greater China Equity Off-shoreFoF Overseas
itself
Edelweiss Greater China Equity Off-shore and Edelweiss US Technology Equity Fund of: no portfolio disclosed for Edelweiss Greater China Equity Off-shore
Edelweiss Greater China Equity Off-shore and HDFC Developed World Overseas Equity Passive FOF: no portfolio disclosed for Edelweiss Greater China Equity Off-shore
Edelweiss Greater China Equity Off-shore and Axis Greater China Equity Fund of: no portfolio disclosed for Edelweiss Greater China Equity Off-shore
Edelweiss US Technology Equity Fund ofFoF Overseas
Edelweiss US Technology Equity Fund of and Edelweiss Greater China Equity Off-shore: no portfolio disclosed for Edelweiss US Technology Equity Fund of
itself
Edelweiss US Technology Equity Fund of and HDFC Developed World Overseas Equity Passive FOF: no portfolio disclosed for Edelweiss US Technology Equity Fund of
Edelweiss US Technology Equity Fund of and Axis Greater China Equity Fund of: no portfolio disclosed for Edelweiss US Technology Equity Fund of
HDFC Developed World Overseas Equity Passive FOFFoF Overseas
HDFC Developed World Overseas Equity Passive FOF and Edelweiss Greater China Equity Off-shore: no portfolio disclosed for Edelweiss Greater China Equity Off-shore
HDFC Developed World Overseas Equity Passive FOF and Edelweiss US Technology Equity Fund of: no portfolio disclosed for Edelweiss US Technology Equity Fund of
itself
HDFC Developed World Overseas Equity Passive FOF and Axis Greater China Equity Fund of share 0% of their portfolios
Axis Greater China Equity Fund ofFoF Overseas
Axis Greater China Equity Fund of and Edelweiss Greater China Equity Off-shore: no portfolio disclosed for Edelweiss Greater China Equity Off-shore
Axis Greater China Equity Fund of and Edelweiss US Technology Equity Fund of: no portfolio disclosed for Edelweiss US Technology Equity Fund of
Axis Greater China Equity Fund of and HDFC Developed World Overseas Equity Passive FOF share 0% of their portfolios
itself

No two of these hold much of the same portfolio. The closest pair, HDFC Developed World Overseas Equity Passive FOF and Axis Greater China Equity Fund of Fund, share 0% — not one holding in common. That is a number, not a resemblance: at this level the two funds are doing separate things, and nothing here says whether that is what you wanted.

2 of these funds have no portfolio on file, so their rows are blank rather than zero — an absence in our data, not a finding about the funds.

Read a cell as: of everything the two funds hold, this much is the same holding at the same weight. It is symmetric — the pair above the diagonal and the pair below it are one number shown twice. A pair at 0% holds nothing in common, which is a real answer, and often the useful one.

Side by side

record, cost, returns, drawdown, size

MeasureEdelweiss Greater China Equity Off-shoreEdelweiss US Technology Equity Fund ofHDFC Developed World Overseas Equity Passive FOFAxis Greater China Equity Fund of
CategoryFoF OverseasFoF OverseasFoF OverseasFoF Overseas
Fund houseEdelweiss Asset Management LimitedEdelweiss Asset Management LimitedHDFC Asset Management Company LimitedAxis Asset Management Co. Ltd.
Share of three-year stretches it beat its category P442% of 8367% of 43100% of 246% of 32
Regular plan costs more than Direct by, a year P51.02% points1.17% points0.53% points1.15% points
Portfolio turned over a year P1not measurednot measurednot measurednot measured
Run by P7not knownnot knownnot knownnot known
1-year return24.4%17.6%25.5%22.3%
3 years p.a.25.6%31.5%25.9%23.5%
5 years p.a.6.6%16.2%—8.3%
Deepest fall (max drawdown)−20.9%−31.5%−18.1%−22.5%
Assets (AUM)₹3,116 Cr₹4,133 Cr₹1,738 Cr₹3,839 Cr
Disclosed history——10 mo5.2 yrs
Holdings · top ten weightnone disclosednone disclosed7 · 100%3 · 100%

Funds in different categories are not comparable on returns — a category error is the first thing the postulates refuse to make. Compare each to its own category on its fund page.