Compare
Up to six funds side by side, and how much of each is the same portfolio as the others. Overlap is Σ min(weight) over the stocks both hold, from the latest disclosures. All 6,937 schemes are searchable — by scheme name, by fund house, or by the category you know them as.
2 of 6 chosen
Add another Large & Mid Cap fund — overlap says most about funds of one kind:
Overlap
share of the portfolio the two funds hold in common
| each fundagainst each other | Edelweiss Large & Mid Cap | Bandhan Large & Mid Cap |
|---|---|---|
| Edelweiss Large & Mid CapLarge & Mid Cap | itself | Edelweiss Large & Mid Cap and Bandhan Large & Mid Cap: no portfolio disclosed for Edelweiss Large & Mid Cap |
| Bandhan Large & Mid CapLarge & Mid Cap | Bandhan Large & Mid Cap and Edelweiss Large & Mid Cap: no portfolio disclosed for Edelweiss Large & Mid Cap | itself |
Edelweiss Large & Mid Cap has no portfolio on file, so its row is blank rather than zero — that is an absence in our data, not a finding about the fund.
Side by side
record, cost, returns, drawdown, size
| Measure | Edelweiss Large & Mid Cap | Bandhan Large & Mid Cap |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Large & Mid Cap | Large & Mid Cap |
| Fund house | Edelweiss Asset Management Limited | Bandhan AMC Limited |
| Share of three-year stretches it beat its category P4 | 75% of 83 | 63% of 109 |
| Regular plan costs more than Direct by, a year P5 | 1.60% points | 1.50% points |
| Portfolio turned over a year P1 | not measured | 166% |
| Run by P7 | not known | Manish Gunwani · ≥ 3.5 yrs |
| 1-year return | 4.0% | 4.1% |
| 3 years p.a. | 14.8% | 18.2% |
| 5 years p.a. | 13.2% | 16.9% |
| Deepest fall (max drawdown) | −18.2% | −17.9% |
| Assets (AUM) | ₹4,537 Cr | ₹19,777 Cr |
| Disclosed history | — | 4.9 yrs |
| Holdings · top ten weight | none disclosed | 136 · 27% |
Funds in different categories are not comparable on returns — a category error is the first thing the postulates refuse to make. Compare each to its own category on its fund page.