Compare
Up to six funds side by side, and how much of each is the same portfolio as the others. Overlap is Σ min(weight) over the stocks both hold, from the latest disclosures. All 6,937 schemes are searchable — by scheme name, by fund house, or by the category you know them as.
3 of 6 chosen
Add another Large & Mid Cap fund — overlap says most about funds of one kind:
Overlap
share of the portfolio the two funds hold in common
| each fundagainst each other | Edelweiss Large & Mid Cap | SBI LARGE & MIDCAP | Canara Robeco Large and Mid Cap |
|---|---|---|---|
| Edelweiss Large & Mid CapLarge & Mid Cap | itself | Edelweiss Large & Mid Cap and SBI LARGE & MIDCAP: no portfolio disclosed for Edelweiss Large & Mid Cap | Edelweiss Large & Mid Cap and Canara Robeco Large and Mid Cap: no portfolio disclosed for Edelweiss Large & Mid Cap |
| SBI LARGE & MIDCAPLarge & Mid Cap | SBI LARGE & MIDCAP and Edelweiss Large & Mid Cap: no portfolio disclosed for Edelweiss Large & Mid Cap | itself | SBI LARGE & MIDCAP and Canara Robeco Large and Mid Cap share 17% of their portfolios |
| Canara Robeco Large and Mid CapLarge & Mid Cap | Canara Robeco Large and Mid Cap and Edelweiss Large & Mid Cap: no portfolio disclosed for Edelweiss Large & Mid Cap | Canara Robeco Large and Mid Cap and SBI LARGE & MIDCAP share 17% of their portfolios | itself |
Closest pair: SBI LARGE & MIDCAP FUND and Canara Robeco Large and Mid Cap Fund share 17% of their portfolios. Most of what each of them holds, the other does not; whether two funds this far apart belong in one portfolio is a separate question.
Edelweiss Large & Mid Cap has no portfolio on file, so its row is blank rather than zero — that is an absence in our data, not a finding about the fund.
Read a cell as: of everything the two funds hold, this much is the same holding at the same weight. It is symmetric — the pair above the diagonal and the pair below it are one number shown twice. A pair at 0% holds nothing in common, which is a real answer, and often the useful one.
Side by side
record, cost, returns, drawdown, size
| Measure | Edelweiss Large & Mid Cap | SBI LARGE & MIDCAP | Canara Robeco Large and Mid Cap |
|---|---|---|---|
| Category | Large & Mid Cap | Large & Mid Cap | Large & Mid Cap |
| Fund house | Edelweiss Asset Management Limited | SBI Funds Management Limited | Canara Robeco Asset Management Company Limited |
| Share of three-year stretches it beat its category P4 | 75% of 83 | 37% of 109 | 60% of 109 |
| Regular plan costs more than Direct by, a year P5 | 1.60% points | 0.81% points | 1.28% points |
| Portfolio turned over a year P1 | not measured | 70% | 61% |
| Run by P7 | not known | Saurabh Pant · ≥ 3 mo | Amit Nadekar · ≥ 1.1 yrs |
| 1-year return | 4.0% | 0.9% | −2.2% |
| 3 years p.a. | 14.8% | 12.7% | 13.1% |
| 5 years p.a. | 13.2% | 13.4% | 10.7% |
| Deepest fall (max drawdown) | −18.2% | −14.2% | −18.3% |
| Assets (AUM) | ₹4,537 Cr | ₹42,320 Cr | ₹26,331 Cr |
| Disclosed history | — | 5.8 yrs | 4.7 yrs |
| Holdings · top ten weight | none disclosed | 94 · 31% | 99 · 37% |
Funds in different categories are not comparable on returns — a category error is the first thing the postulates refuse to make. Compare each to its own category on its fund page.