Compare
Up to six funds side by side, and how much of each is the same portfolio as the others. Overlap is Σ min(weight) over the stocks both hold, from the latest disclosures.
Overlap
share of the portfolio the two funds hold in common
| Nippon India ETF Hang Seng BeES | ICICI Prudential Nifty 50 ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Nippon India ETF Hang Seng BeES | itself | 0% |
| ICICI Prudential Nifty 50 ETF | 0% | itself |
Most alike: Nippon India ETF Hang Seng BeES and ICICI Prudential Nifty 50 ETF share 0% of their portfolios. Two funds this different are doing different things; whether that is what you want is a separate question.
Side by side
record, cost, returns, drawdown, size
| Measure | Nippon India ETF Hang Seng BeES | ICICI Prudential Nifty 50 ETF |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Other ETFs | Other ETFs |
| Share of three-year stretches it beat its category P4 | 17% of 83 | 28% of 109 |
| Regular plan costs more than Direct by, a year P5 | not measured | not measured |
| Portfolio turned over a year P1 | not measured | 32% |
| Run by P7 | Kinjal Desai · 8.3 yrs | Nishit Patel · 5.7 yrs |
| 1-year return | 4.3% | −6.1% |
| 3 years p.a. | 20.7% | 7.1% |
| 5 years p.a. | 8.2% | 7.1% |
| Deepest fall (max drawdown) | −20.4% | −15.4% |
| Assets (AUM) | ₹1,022 Cr | ₹44,570 Cr |
| Disclosed history | 9.8 yrs | 12 yrs |
| Holdings · top ten weight | 96 · 49% | 52 · 53% |
Funds in different categories are not comparable on returns — a category error is the first thing the postulates refuse to make. Compare each to its own category on its fund page.