Compare
Up to six funds side by side, and how much of each is the same portfolio as the others. Overlap is Σ min(weight) over the stocks both hold, from the latest disclosures.
Overlap
share of the portfolio the two funds hold in common
| PGIM India Large Cap | Nippon India Large Cap | |
|---|---|---|
| PGIM India Large Cap | itself | 0% |
| Nippon India Large Cap | 0% | itself |
Most alike: PGIM India Large Cap Fund and Nippon India Large Cap Fund share 0% of their portfolios. Two funds this different are doing different things; whether that is what you want is a separate question.
Side by side
record, cost, returns, drawdown, size
| Measure | PGIM India Large Cap | Nippon India Large Cap |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Large Cap | Large Cap |
| Share of three-year stretches it beat its category P4 | 23% of 91 | 73% of 109 |
| Regular plan costs more than Direct by, a year P5 | 1.65% | 1.01% |
| Portfolio turned over a year P1 | not measured | 57% |
| Run by P7 | not known | Sailesh Raj Bhan · 19 yrs |
| 1-year return | −4.4% | −4.7% |
| 3 years p.a. | 7.7% | 11.1% |
| 5 years p.a. | 6.8% | 12.8% |
| Deepest fall (max drawdown) | −17.0% | −15.4% |
| Assets (AUM) | ₹539 Cr | ₹52,344 Cr |
| Disclosed history | — | 13 yrs |
| Holdings · top ten weight | — · — | 69 · 45% |
Funds in different categories are not comparable on returns — a category error is the first thing the postulates refuse to make. Compare each to its own category on its fund page.