Compare
Up to six funds side by side, and how much of each is the same portfolio as the others. Overlap is Σ min(weight) over the stocks both hold, from the latest disclosures.
Overlap
share of the portfolio the two funds hold in common
| Tata Banking & Financial Services | ICICI Prudential Banking & Financial Services | |
|---|---|---|
| Tata Banking & Financial Services | itself | 54% |
| ICICI Prudential Banking & Financial Services | 54% | itself |
Most alike: Tata Banking & Financial Services Fund and ICICI Prudential Banking & Financial Services Fund share 54% of their portfolios. Holding both is closer to holding one twice than to diversifying.
Side by side
record, cost, returns, drawdown, size
| Measure | Tata Banking & Financial Services | ICICI Prudential Banking & Financial Services |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Sectoral/ Thematic | Sectoral/ Thematic |
| Share of three-year stretches it beat its category P4 | 47% of 94 | 35% of 109 |
| Regular plan costs more than Direct by, a year P5 | 1.82% | 1.08% |
| Portfolio turned over a year P1 | 99% | 75% |
| Run by P7 | Kapil Malhotra · 9 mo | Antariksha Banerjee · 7 mo |
| 1-year return | 4.5% | −2.2% |
| 3 years p.a. | 12.5% | 9.8% |
| 5 years p.a. | 12.5% | 9.7% |
| Deepest fall (max drawdown) | −16.5% | −17.0% |
| Assets (AUM) | ₹3,206 Cr | ₹11,267 Cr |
| Disclosed history | 11 yrs | 13 yrs |
| Holdings · top ten weight | 38 · 61% | 59 · 63% |
Funds in different categories are not comparable on returns — a category error is the first thing the postulates refuse to make. Compare each to its own category on its fund page.