Compare
Up to six funds side by side, and how much of each is the same portfolio as the others. Overlap is Σ min(weight) over the stocks both hold, from the latest disclosures.
Overlap
share of the portfolio the two funds hold in common
| UTI Nifty 50 ETF | UTI Nifty Bank ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| UTI Nifty 50 ETF | itself | 29% |
| UTI Nifty Bank ETF | 29% | itself |
Most alike: UTI Nifty 50 ETF and UTI Nifty Bank ETF share 29% of their portfolios. Two funds this different are doing different things; whether that is what you want is a separate question.
Side by side
record, cost, returns, drawdown, size
| Measure | UTI Nifty 50 ETF | UTI Nifty Bank ETF |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Equity ETF | Equity ETF |
| Share of three-year stretches it beat its category P4 | 58% of 97 | 22% of 37 |
| Regular plan costs more than Direct by, a year P5 | not measured | not measured |
| Portfolio turned over a year P1 | 31% | 43% |
| Run by P7 | Sharwan Kumar Goyal · 8.2 yrs | Sharwan Kumar Goyal · 6.0 yrs |
| 1-year return | −6.1% | 2.6% |
| 3 years p.a. | −50.3% | 8.8% |
| 5 years p.a. | −32.6% | 9.3% |
| Deepest fall (max drawdown) | −90.4% | −18.4% |
| Assets (AUM) | ₹72,214 Cr | ₹3,152 Cr |
| Disclosed history | 4.3 yrs | 5.9 yrs |
| Holdings · top ten weight | 51 · 53% | 15 · 87% |
Funds in different categories are not comparable on returns — a category error is the first thing the postulates refuse to make. Compare each to its own category on its fund page.