Compare
Up to six funds side by side, and how much of each is the same portfolio as the others. Overlap is Σ min(weight) over the stocks both hold, from the latest disclosures.
Overlap
share of the portfolio the two funds hold in common
| Nippon India ETF Nifty 50 Value 20 | ICICI Prudential Nifty 50 ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Nippon India ETF Nifty 50 Value 20 | itself | 57% |
| ICICI Prudential Nifty 50 ETF | 57% | itself |
Most alike: Nippon India ETF Nifty 50 Value 20 and ICICI Prudential Nifty 50 ETF share 57% of their portfolios. Holding both is closer to holding one twice than to diversifying.
Side by side
record, cost, returns, drawdown, size
| Measure | Nippon India ETF Nifty 50 Value 20 | ICICI Prudential Nifty 50 ETF |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Other ETFs | Other ETFs |
| Share of three-year stretches it beat its category P4 | 50% of 100 | 28% of 109 |
| Regular plan costs more than Direct by, a year P5 | not measured | not measured |
| Portfolio turned over a year P1 | 86% | 32% |
| Run by P7 | Jitendra Tolani · 1.5 yrs | Nishit Patel · 5.7 yrs |
| 1-year return | −9.0% | −6.1% |
| 3 years p.a. | 4.6% | 7.1% |
| 5 years p.a. | 6.5% | 7.1% |
| Deepest fall (max drawdown) | −19.4% | −15.4% |
| Assets (AUM) | ₹151 Cr | ₹44,570 Cr |
| Disclosed history | 5.9 yrs | 12 yrs |
| Holdings · top ten weight | 23 · 78% | 52 · 53% |
Funds in different categories are not comparable on returns — a category error is the first thing the postulates refuse to make. Compare each to its own category on its fund page.