Compare
Up to six funds side by side, and how much of each is the same portfolio as the others. Overlap is Σ min(weight) over the stocks both hold, from the latest disclosures.
Overlap
share of the portfolio the two funds hold in common
| Quantum Dynamic Term | UTI - Dynamic Bond Fund ( Segregated - 17022020) | |
|---|---|---|
| Quantum Dynamic Term | itself | 0% |
| UTI - Dynamic Bond Fund ( Segregated - 17022020) | 0% | itself |
Most alike: Quantum Dynamic Term Fund and UTI - Dynamic Bond Fund ( Segregated - 17022020) share 0% of their portfolios. Two funds this different are doing different things; whether that is what you want is a separate question.
Side by side
record, cost, returns, drawdown, size
| Measure | Quantum Dynamic Term | UTI - Dynamic Bond Fund ( Segregated - 17022020) |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Dynamic Bond | Dynamic Bond |
| Share of three-year stretches it beat its category P4 | 67% of 52 | not measured |
| Regular plan costs more than Direct by, a year P5 | 0.25% | 1.33% |
| Portfolio turned over a year P1 | not measured | not measured |
| Run by P7 | Sneha Pandey · 1.4 yrs | Pankaj Pathak · 1.4 yrs |
| 1-year return | 3.7% | 342.6% |
| 3 years p.a. | 6.8% | — |
| 5 years p.a. | 6.2% | — |
| Deepest fall (max drawdown) | −1.6% | not computed |
| Assets (AUM) | ₹89 Cr | ₹418 Cr |
| Disclosed history | 11 yrs | 1.9 yrs |
| Holdings · top ten weight | 17 · 84% | 2 · 100% |
Funds in different categories are not comparable on returns — a category error is the first thing the postulates refuse to make. Compare each to its own category on its fund page.