Compare
Up to six funds side by side, and how much of each is the same portfolio as the others. Overlap is Σ min(weight) over the stocks both hold, from the latest disclosures. All 6,937 schemes are searchable — by scheme name, by fund house, or by the category you know them as.
4 of 6 chosen
The largest fund in each of these kinds, to start from — or search above:
Overlap
share of the portfolio the two funds hold in common
| each fundagainst each other | Reliance Capital Builder Fund II - Series C | ICICI Prudential Bharat Consumption Fund - Series 1 | ICICI Prudential Value Fund - Series 16 | Nippon India Multi Cap |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliance Capital Builder Fund II - Series CGrowth | itself | Reliance Capital Builder Fund II - Series C and ICICI Prudential Bharat Consumption Fund - Series 1 share 4% of their portfolios | Reliance Capital Builder Fund II - Series C and ICICI Prudential Value Fund - Series 16 share 0% of their portfolios | Reliance Capital Builder Fund II - Series C and Nippon India Multi Cap share 20% of their portfolios |
| ICICI Prudential Bharat Consumption Fund - Series 1Growth | ICICI Prudential Bharat Consumption Fund - Series 1 and Reliance Capital Builder Fund II - Series C share 4% of their portfolios | itself | ICICI Prudential Bharat Consumption Fund - Series 1 and ICICI Prudential Value Fund - Series 16 share 0% of their portfolios | ICICI Prudential Bharat Consumption Fund - Series 1 and Nippon India Multi Cap share 4% of their portfolios |
| ICICI Prudential Value Fund - Series 16Growth | ICICI Prudential Value Fund - Series 16 and Reliance Capital Builder Fund II - Series C share 0% of their portfolios | ICICI Prudential Value Fund - Series 16 and ICICI Prudential Bharat Consumption Fund - Series 1 share 0% of their portfolios | itself | ICICI Prudential Value Fund - Series 16 and Nippon India Multi Cap share 0% of their portfolios |
| Nippon India Multi CapMulti Cap | Nippon India Multi Cap and Reliance Capital Builder Fund II - Series C share 20% of their portfolios | Nippon India Multi Cap and ICICI Prudential Bharat Consumption Fund - Series 1 share 4% of their portfolios | Nippon India Multi Cap and ICICI Prudential Value Fund - Series 16 share 0% of their portfolios | itself |
Closest pair: Reliance Capital Builder Fund II - Series C and Nippon India Multi Cap Fund share 20% of their portfolios. Most of what each of them holds, the other does not; whether two funds this far apart belong in one portfolio is a separate question.
Read a cell as: of everything the two funds hold, this much is the same holding at the same weight. It is symmetric — the pair above the diagonal and the pair below it are one number shown twice. A pair at 0% holds nothing in common, which is a real answer, and often the useful one.
Side by side
record, cost, returns, drawdown, size
| Measure | Reliance Capital Builder Fund II - Series C | ICICI Prudential Bharat Consumption Fund - Series 1 | ICICI Prudential Value Fund - Series 16 | Nippon India Multi Cap |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Category | Growth | Growth | Growth | Multi Cap |
| Fund house | Nippon Life India Asset Management Limited | ICICI Prudential Asset Management Company Limited | ICICI Prudential Asset Management Company Limited | Nippon Life India Asset Management Limited |
| Share of three-year stretches it beat its category P4 | not measured | 75% of 8 | 63% of 8 | 50% of 109 |
| Regular plan costs more than Direct by, a year P5 | 1.13% points | 0.81% points | 0.93% points | 0.84% points |
| Portfolio turned over a year P1 | 62% | 132% | 79% | 66% |
| Run by P7 | not known | not known | Sankaran Naren · 3.6 yrs | Sailesh Raj Bhan · 21 yrs |
| 1-year return | 7.4% | 53.9% | 15.9% | −1.4% |
| 3 years p.a. | — | 17.3% | 6.2% | 13.5% |
| 5 years p.a. | — | — | — | 16.4% |
| Deepest fall (max drawdown) | not computed | not computed | not computed | −18.6% |
| Assets (AUM) | ₹490 Cr | ₹487 Cr | ₹463 Cr | ₹53,760 Cr |
| Disclosed history | 3.0 yrs | 3.3 yrs | 3.3 yrs | 14 yrs |
| Holdings · top ten weight | 42 · 46% | 30 · 86% | 3 · 100% | 123 · 29% |
Funds in different categories are not comparable on returns — a category error is the first thing the postulates refuse to make. Compare each to its own category on its fund page.