Compare
Up to six funds side by side, and how much of each is the same portfolio as the others. Overlap is Σ min(weight) over the stocks both hold, from the latest disclosures. All 6,937 schemes are searchable — by scheme name, by fund house, or by the category you know them as.
3 of 6 chosen
Add another Ultra Short to Short Term fund — overlap says most about funds of one kind:
Overlap
share of the portfolio the two funds hold in common
| each fundagainst each other | Kotak Ultra Short to Short Term | ICICI Prudential Ultra Short to Short Term | Tata Ultra Short to Short Term |
|---|---|---|---|
| Kotak Ultra Short to Short TermUltra Short to Short Term | itself | Kotak Ultra Short to Short Term and ICICI Prudential Ultra Short to Short Term: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Ultra Short to Short Term | Kotak Ultra Short to Short Term and Tata Ultra Short to Short Term: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Ultra Short to Short Term |
| ICICI Prudential Ultra Short to Short TermUltra Short to Short Term | ICICI Prudential Ultra Short to Short Term and Kotak Ultra Short to Short Term: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Ultra Short to Short Term | itself | ICICI Prudential Ultra Short to Short Term and Tata Ultra Short to Short Term share 0% of their portfolios |
| Tata Ultra Short to Short TermUltra Short to Short Term | Tata Ultra Short to Short Term and Kotak Ultra Short to Short Term: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Ultra Short to Short Term | Tata Ultra Short to Short Term and ICICI Prudential Ultra Short to Short Term share 0% of their portfolios | itself |
No two of these hold much of the same portfolio. The closest pair, ICICI Prudential Ultra Short to Short Term Fund and Tata Ultra Short to Short Term Fund, share 0% — not one holding in common. That is a number, not a resemblance: at this level the two funds are doing separate things, and nothing here says whether that is what you wanted.
Kotak Ultra Short to Short Term has no portfolio on file, so its row is blank rather than zero — that is an absence in our data, not a finding about the fund.
Read a cell as: of everything the two funds hold, this much is the same holding at the same weight. It is symmetric — the pair above the diagonal and the pair below it are one number shown twice. A pair at 0% holds nothing in common, which is a real answer, and often the useful one.
Side by side
record, cost, returns, drawdown, size
| Measure | Kotak Ultra Short to Short Term | ICICI Prudential Ultra Short to Short Term | Tata Ultra Short to Short Term |
|---|---|---|---|
| Category | Ultra Short to Short Term | Ultra Short to Short Term | Ultra Short to Short Term |
| Fund house | Kotak Mahindra Asset Management Company Limited. | ICICI Prudential Asset Management Company Limited | Tata Asset Management Limited |
| Share of three-year stretches it beat its category P4 | 100% of 104 | 98% of 109 | 13% of 109 |
| Regular plan costs more than Direct by, a year P5 | 0.81% points | 0.13% points | 0.27% points |
| Portfolio turned over a year P1 | not measured | not measured | not measured |
| Run by P7 | not known | Darshil Dedhia · 3.3 yrs | Amit Somani · ≥ 9 mo |
| 1-year return | 6.4% | 6.5% | 6.4% |
| 3 years p.a. | 7.5% | 7.4% | 7.3% |
| 5 years p.a. | 6.8% | 6.7% | 6.5% |
| Deepest fall (max drawdown) | −0.2% | −0.2% | −0.2% |
| Assets (AUM) | ₹14,531 Cr | ₹21,200 Cr | ₹6,002 Cr |
| Disclosed history | — | 2.2 yrs | 1.3 yrs |
| Holdings · top ten weight | none disclosed | 139 · 27% | 77 · 34% |
Funds in different categories are not comparable on returns — a category error is the first thing the postulates refuse to make. Compare each to its own category on its fund page.