Compare
Up to six funds side by side, and how much of each is the same portfolio as the others. Overlap is Σ min(weight) over the stocks both hold, from the latest disclosures. All 6,937 schemes are searchable — by scheme name, by fund house, or by the category you know them as.
2 of 6 chosen
The largest fund in each of these kinds, to start from — or search above:
Overlap
share of the portfolio the two funds hold in common
| each fundagainst each other | UTI Dual Advantage Fixed Term Fund Series I- II (1145 Days) | ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund) |
|---|---|---|
| UTI Dual Advantage Fixed Term Fund Series I- II (1145 Days)Uncategorised | itself | UTI Dual Advantage Fixed Term Fund Series I- II (1145 Days) and ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund) share 4% of their portfolios |
| ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund)Value | ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund) and UTI Dual Advantage Fixed Term Fund Series I- II (1145 Days) share 4% of their portfolios | itself |
No two of these hold much of the same portfolio. The closest pair, UTI Dual Advantage Fixed Term Fund Series I- II (1145 Days) and ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund), share 4%. That is a number, not a resemblance: at this level the two funds are doing separate things, and nothing here says whether that is what you wanted.
Read a cell as: of everything the two funds hold, this much is the same holding at the same weight. It is symmetric — the pair above the diagonal and the pair below it are one number shown twice. A pair at 0% holds nothing in common, which is a real answer, and often the useful one.
Side by side
record, cost, returns, drawdown, size
| Measure | UTI Dual Advantage Fixed Term Fund Series I- II (1145 Days) | ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund) |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Uncategorised | Value |
| Fund house | UTI Asset Mgmt. Co. Ltd. | ICICI Prudential Asset Management Company Limited |
| Share of three-year stretches it beat its category P4 | not measured | 68% of 109 |
| Regular plan costs more than Direct by, a year P5 | 1.45% points | 0.83% points |
| Portfolio turned over a year P1 | 10% | 58% |
| Run by P7 | not known | Dharmesh Kakkad · 5.7 yrs |
| 1-year return | 7.3% | −5.4% |
| 3 years p.a. | 8.1% | 11.5% |
| 5 years p.a. | — | 13.5% |
| Deepest fall (max drawdown) | not computed | −14.0% |
| Assets (AUM) | ₹6 Cr | ₹60,800 Cr |
| Disclosed history | 3.0 yrs | 13 yrs |
| Holdings · top ten weight | 24 · 95% | 66 · 52% |
Funds in different categories are not comparable on returns — a category error is the first thing the postulates refuse to make. Compare each to its own category on its fund page.