Compare
Up to six funds side by side, and how much of each is the same portfolio as the others. Overlap is Σ min(weight) over the stocks both hold, from the latest disclosures. All 6,937 schemes are searchable — by scheme name, by fund house, or by the category you know them as.
3 of 6 chosen
The largest fund in each of these kinds, to start from — or search above:
Overlap
share of the portfolio the two funds hold in common
| each fundagainst each other | Sundaram Fixed Term Plan GU Regular Plan Growth | Nippon India Small Cap | ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sundaram Fixed Term Plan GU Regular Plan GrowthUncategorised | itself | Sundaram Fixed Term Plan GU Regular Plan Growth and Nippon India Small Cap: no portfolio disclosed for Sundaram Fixed Term Plan GU Regular Plan Growth | Sundaram Fixed Term Plan GU Regular Plan Growth and ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund): no portfolio disclosed for Sundaram Fixed Term Plan GU Regular Plan Growth |
| Nippon India Small CapSmall Cap | Nippon India Small Cap and Sundaram Fixed Term Plan GU Regular Plan Growth: no portfolio disclosed for Sundaram Fixed Term Plan GU Regular Plan Growth | itself | Nippon India Small Cap and ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund) share 8% of their portfolios |
| ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund)Value | ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund) and Sundaram Fixed Term Plan GU Regular Plan Growth: no portfolio disclosed for Sundaram Fixed Term Plan GU Regular Plan Growth | ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund) and Nippon India Small Cap share 8% of their portfolios | itself |
No two of these hold much of the same portfolio. The closest pair, Nippon India Small Cap Fund and ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund), share 8%. That is a number, not a resemblance: at this level the two funds are doing separate things, and nothing here says whether that is what you wanted.
Sundaram Fixed Term Plan GU Regular Plan Growth has no portfolio on file, so its row is blank rather than zero — that is an absence in our data, not a finding about the fund.
Read a cell as: of everything the two funds hold, this much is the same holding at the same weight. It is symmetric — the pair above the diagonal and the pair below it are one number shown twice. A pair at 0% holds nothing in common, which is a real answer, and often the useful one.
Side by side
record, cost, returns, drawdown, size
| Measure | Sundaram Fixed Term Plan GU Regular Plan Growth | Nippon India Small Cap | ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Category | Uncategorised | Small Cap | Value |
| Fund house | Sundaram Asset Management Company Ltd | Nippon Life India Asset Management Limited | ICICI Prudential Asset Management Company Limited |
| Share of three-year stretches it beat its category P4 | not measured | 90% of 109 | 68% of 109 |
| Regular plan costs more than Direct by, a year P5 | not measured | 1.10% points | 0.83% points |
| Portfolio turned over a year P1 | not measured | 68% | 58% |
| Run by P7 | not known | Samir Rachh · 9.6 yrs | Dharmesh Kakkad · 5.7 yrs |
| 1-year return | 6.8% | 8.9% | −5.4% |
| 3 years p.a. | 8.2% | 16.1% | 11.5% |
| 5 years p.a. | — | 19.0% | 13.5% |
| Deepest fall (max drawdown) | not computed | −24.2% | −14.0% |
| Assets (AUM) | ₹0 Cr | ₹76,236 Cr | ₹60,800 Cr |
| Disclosed history | — | 14 yrs | 13 yrs |
| Holdings · top ten weight | none disclosed | 257 · 16% | 66 · 52% |
Funds in different categories are not comparable on returns — a category error is the first thing the postulates refuse to make. Compare each to its own category on its fund page.