Compare
Up to six funds side by side, and how much of each is the same portfolio as the others. Overlap is Σ min(weight) over the stocks both hold, from the latest disclosures.
Overlap
share of the portfolio the two funds hold in common
| ICICI Prudential 10 year Constant Maturity Gilt | UTI 10 year Constant Maturity Gilt | |
|---|---|---|
| ICICI Prudential 10 year Constant Maturity Gilt | itself | 53% |
| UTI 10 year Constant Maturity Gilt | 53% | itself |
Most alike: ICICI Prudential 10 year Constant Maturity Gilt Fund and UTI 10 year Constant Maturity Gilt Fund share 53% of their portfolios. Holding both is closer to holding one twice than to diversifying.
Side by side
record, cost, returns, drawdown, size
| Measure | ICICI Prudential 10 year Constant Maturity Gilt | UTI 10 year Constant Maturity Gilt |
|---|---|---|
| Category | 10-year Constant Maturity Gilt | 10-year Constant Maturity Gilt |
| Share of three-year stretches it beat its category P4 | 78% of 109 | 14% of 14 |
| Regular plan costs more than Direct by, a year P5 | 0.21% | 0.51% |
| Portfolio turned over a year P1 | not measured | not measured |
| Run by P7 | Manish Banthia · 2.7 yrs | Jaydeep Bhowal · 1.9 yrs |
| 1-year return | 4.2% | 3.3% |
| 3 years p.a. | 7.2% | 6.8% |
| 5 years p.a. | 5.8% | — |
| Deepest fall (max drawdown) | −2.7% | −2.7% |
| Assets (AUM) | ₹1,987 Cr | ₹114 Cr |
| Disclosed history | 12 yrs | 4.1 yrs |
| Holdings · top ten weight | 10 · 100% | 9 · 100% |
Funds in different categories are not comparable on returns — a category error is the first thing the postulates refuse to make. Compare each to its own category on its fund page.