Compare
Up to six funds side by side, and how much of each is the same portfolio as the others. Overlap is Σ min(weight) over the stocks both hold, from the latest disclosures. All 6,937 schemes are searchable — by scheme name, by fund house, or by the category you know them as.
3 of 6 chosen
Add another Small Cap fund — overlap says most about funds of one kind:
Overlap
share of the portfolio the two funds hold in common
| each fundagainst each other | HDFC Small Cap | Motilal Oswal Midcap | Bandhan Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| HDFC Small CapSmall Cap | itself | HDFC Small Cap and Motilal Oswal Midcap share 0% of their portfolios | HDFC Small Cap and Bandhan Value share 1% of their portfolios |
| Motilal Oswal MidcapMid Cap | Motilal Oswal Midcap and HDFC Small Cap share 0% of their portfolios | itself | Motilal Oswal Midcap and Bandhan Value share 4% of their portfolios |
| Bandhan ValueValue | Bandhan Value and HDFC Small Cap share 1% of their portfolios | Bandhan Value and Motilal Oswal Midcap share 4% of their portfolios | itself |
No two of these hold much of the same portfolio. The closest pair, Motilal Oswal Midcap Fund and Bandhan Value Fund, share 4%. That is a number, not a resemblance: at this level the two funds are doing separate things, and nothing here says whether that is what you wanted.
Read a cell as: of everything the two funds hold, this much is the same holding at the same weight. It is symmetric — the pair above the diagonal and the pair below it are one number shown twice. A pair at 0% holds nothing in common, which is a real answer, and often the useful one.
Side by side
record, cost, returns, drawdown, size
| Measure | HDFC Small Cap | Motilal Oswal Midcap | Bandhan Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Category | Small Cap | Mid Cap | Value |
| Fund house | HDFC Asset Management Company Limited | Motilal Oswal Asset Management Company Limited | Bandhan AMC Limited |
| Share of three-year stretches it beat its category P4 | 63% of 109 | 54% of 109 | 67% of 109 |
| Regular plan costs more than Direct by, a year P5 | 1.25% points | 1.37% points | 1.17% points |
| Portfolio turned over a year P1 | 46% | 92% | 68% |
| Run by P7 | not known | Rakesh Shetty · 3.8 yrs | Daylynn Pinto · ≥ 3.5 yrs |
| 1-year return | −2.6% | −0.5% | −1.1% |
| 3 years p.a. | 11.3% | 19.5% | 10.4% |
| 5 years p.a. | 14.8% | 21.1% | 12.8% |
| Deepest fall (max drawdown) | −22.6% | −28.9% | −17.9% |
| Assets (AUM) | ₹42,162 Cr | ₹41,706 Cr | ₹10,051 Cr |
| Disclosed history | 2.4 yrs | 4.0 yrs | 4.9 yrs |
| Holdings · top ten weight | 87 · 35% | 32 · 54% | 68 · 47% |
Funds in different categories are not comparable on returns — a category error is the first thing the postulates refuse to make. Compare each to its own category on its fund page.