Compare
Up to six funds side by side, and how much of each is the same portfolio as the others. Overlap is Σ min(weight) over the stocks both hold, from the latest disclosures. All 6,937 schemes are searchable — by scheme name, by fund house, or by the category you know them as.
4 of 6 chosen
Add another Small Cap fund — overlap says most about funds of one kind:
Overlap
share of the portfolio the two funds hold in common
| each fundagainst each other | HDFC Small Cap | Nippon India Growth Mid Cap | Tata Value | Nippon India Small Cap |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HDFC Small CapSmall Cap | itself | HDFC Small Cap and Nippon India Growth Mid Cap share 6% of their portfolios | HDFC Small Cap and Tata Value share 3% of their portfolios | HDFC Small Cap and Nippon India Small Cap share 11% of their portfolios |
| Nippon India Growth Mid CapMid Cap | Nippon India Growth Mid Cap and HDFC Small Cap share 6% of their portfolios | itself | Nippon India Growth Mid Cap and Tata Value share 11% of their portfolios | Nippon India Growth Mid Cap and Nippon India Small Cap share 16% of their portfolios |
| Tata ValueValue | Tata Value and HDFC Small Cap share 3% of their portfolios | Tata Value and Nippon India Growth Mid Cap share 11% of their portfolios | itself | Tata Value and Nippon India Small Cap share 5% of their portfolios |
| Nippon India Small CapSmall Cap | Nippon India Small Cap and HDFC Small Cap share 11% of their portfolios | Nippon India Small Cap and Nippon India Growth Mid Cap share 16% of their portfolios | Nippon India Small Cap and Tata Value share 5% of their portfolios | itself |
Closest pair: Nippon India Growth Mid Cap Fund and Nippon India Small Cap Fund share 16% of their portfolios. Most of what each of them holds, the other does not; whether two funds this far apart belong in one portfolio is a separate question.
Read a cell as: of everything the two funds hold, this much is the same holding at the same weight. It is symmetric — the pair above the diagonal and the pair below it are one number shown twice. A pair at 0% holds nothing in common, which is a real answer, and often the useful one.
Side by side
record, cost, returns, drawdown, size
| Measure | HDFC Small Cap | Nippon India Growth Mid Cap | Tata Value | Nippon India Small Cap |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Category | Small Cap | Mid Cap | Value | Small Cap |
| Fund house | HDFC Asset Management Company Limited | Nippon Life India Asset Management Limited | Tata Asset Management Limited | Nippon Life India Asset Management Limited |
| Share of three-year stretches it beat its category P4 | 63% of 109 | 87% of 109 | 63% of 109 | 90% of 109 |
| Regular plan costs more than Direct by, a year P5 | 1.25% points | 0.86% points | 1.15% points | 1.10% points |
| Portfolio turned over a year P1 | 46% | 52% | 81% | 68% |
| Run by P7 | not known | Rupesh Patel · 3.6 yrs | Sonam Udasi · ≥ 9 mo | Samir Rachh · 9.6 yrs |
| 1-year return | −2.6% | 7.0% | 0.2% | 8.9% |
| 3 years p.a. | 11.3% | 18.6% | 12.9% | 16.1% |
| 5 years p.a. | 14.8% | 18.0% | 13.3% | 19.0% |
| Deepest fall (max drawdown) | −22.6% | −19.9% | −20.9% | −24.2% |
| Assets (AUM) | ₹42,162 Cr | ₹48,143 Cr | ₹8,440 Cr | ₹76,236 Cr |
| Disclosed history | 2.4 yrs | 14 yrs | 11 yrs | 14 yrs |
| Holdings · top ten weight | 87 · 35% | 105 · 25% | 41 · 52% | 257 · 16% |
Funds in different categories are not comparable on returns — a category error is the first thing the postulates refuse to make. Compare each to its own category on its fund page.