Compare
Up to six funds side by side, and how much of each is the same portfolio as the others. Overlap is Σ min(weight) over the stocks both hold, from the latest disclosures.
Overlap
share of the portfolio the two funds hold in common
| ICICI Prudential Dividend Yield | UTI - Dividend Yield | |
|---|---|---|
| ICICI Prudential Dividend Yield | itself | 36% |
| UTI - Dividend Yield | 36% | itself |
Most alike: ICICI Prudential Dividend Yield Fund and UTI - Dividend Yield Fund share 36% of their portfolios. Two funds this different are doing different things; whether that is what you want is a separate question.
Side by side
record, cost, returns, drawdown, size
| Measure | ICICI Prudential Dividend Yield | UTI - Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Dividend Yield | Dividend Yield |
| Share of three-year stretches it beat its category P4 | 3% of 109 | 70% of 109 |
| Regular plan costs more than Direct by, a year P5 | not measured | not measured |
| Portfolio turned over a year P1 | not measured | 46% |
| Run by P7 | Mittul Kalawadia · 8.7 yrs | Amit Premchandani · 3.8 yrs |
| 1-year return | −10.9% | −2.7% |
| 3 years p.a. | 5.3% | 12.5% |
| 5 years p.a. | 6.4% | 10.4% |
| Deepest fall (max drawdown) | −23.8% | −18.2% |
| Assets (AUM) | ₹6,764 Cr | ₹3,780 Cr |
| Disclosed history | 1 mo | 12 yrs |
| Holdings · top ten weight | 75 · 43% | 63 · 36% |
Funds in different categories are not comparable on returns — a category error is the first thing the postulates refuse to make. Compare each to its own category on its fund page.