Compare
Up to six funds side by side, and how much of each is the same portfolio as the others. Overlap is Σ min(weight) over the stocks both hold, from the latest disclosures.
Overlap
share of the portfolio the two funds hold in common
| Nippon India ETF Nifty India Consumption | SBI Nifty 50 ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Nippon India ETF Nifty India Consumption | itself | 25% |
| SBI Nifty 50 ETF | 25% | itself |
Most alike: Nippon India ETF Nifty India Consumption and SBI Nifty 50 ETF share 25% of their portfolios. Two funds this different are doing different things; whether that is what you want is a separate question.
Side by side
record, cost, returns, drawdown, size
| Measure | Nippon India ETF Nifty India Consumption | SBI Nifty 50 ETF |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Other ETFs | Other ETFs |
| Share of three-year stretches it beat its category P4 | 56% of 109 | 2% of 99 |
| Regular plan costs more than Direct by, a year P5 | not measured | not measured |
| Portfolio turned over a year P1 | 32% | 32% |
| Run by P7 | Jitendra Tolani · 1.5 yrs | Viral Chhadva · 7 mo |
| 1-year return | −7.5% | −6.1% |
| 3 years p.a. | 11.2% | 7.0% |
| 5 years p.a. | 10.6% | 7.1% |
| Deepest fall (max drawdown) | −21.9% | −15.4% |
| Assets (AUM) | ₹200 Cr | ₹2.14 lakh Cr |
| Disclosed history | 12 yrs | 5.8 yrs |
| Holdings · top ten weight | 33 · 60% | 52 · 53% |
Funds in different categories are not comparable on returns — a category error is the first thing the postulates refuse to make. Compare each to its own category on its fund page.