Compare
Up to six funds side by side, and how much of each is the same portfolio as the others. Overlap is Σ min(weight) over the stocks both hold, from the latest disclosures. All 6,937 schemes are searchable — by scheme name, by fund house, or by the category you know them as.
5 of 6 chosen
Add another Other ETFs fund — overlap says most about funds of one kind:
Overlap
share of the portfolio the two funds hold in common
| each fundagainst each other | Nippon India ETF Nifty India Consumption | ICICI Prudential Nifty 50 ETF | Nippon India Silver ETF | SBI BSE SENSEX ETF | Bharat Bond ETF - April 2030 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nippon India ETF Nifty India ConsumptionOther ETFs | itself | Nippon India ETF Nifty India Consumption and ICICI Prudential Nifty 50 ETF share 26% of their portfolios | Nippon India ETF Nifty India Consumption and Nippon India Silver ETF share 0% of their portfolios | Nippon India ETF Nifty India Consumption and SBI BSE SENSEX ETF share 24% of their portfolios | Nippon India ETF Nifty India Consumption and Bharat Bond ETF - April 2030: no portfolio disclosed for Bharat Bond ETF - April 2030 |
| ICICI Prudential Nifty 50 ETFOther ETFs | ICICI Prudential Nifty 50 ETF and Nippon India ETF Nifty India Consumption share 26% of their portfolios | itself | ICICI Prudential Nifty 50 ETF and Nippon India Silver ETF share 0% of their portfolios | ICICI Prudential Nifty 50 ETF and SBI BSE SENSEX ETF share 83% of their portfolios | ICICI Prudential Nifty 50 ETF and Bharat Bond ETF - April 2030: no portfolio disclosed for Bharat Bond ETF - April 2030 |
| Nippon India Silver ETFOther ETFs | Nippon India Silver ETF and Nippon India ETF Nifty India Consumption share 0% of their portfolios | Nippon India Silver ETF and ICICI Prudential Nifty 50 ETF share 0% of their portfolios | itself | Nippon India Silver ETF and SBI BSE SENSEX ETF share 0% of their portfolios | Nippon India Silver ETF and Bharat Bond ETF - April 2030: no portfolio disclosed for Bharat Bond ETF - April 2030 |
| SBI BSE SENSEX ETFOther ETFs | SBI BSE SENSEX ETF and Nippon India ETF Nifty India Consumption share 24% of their portfolios | SBI BSE SENSEX ETF and ICICI Prudential Nifty 50 ETF share 83% of their portfolios | SBI BSE SENSEX ETF and Nippon India Silver ETF share 0% of their portfolios | itself | SBI BSE SENSEX ETF and Bharat Bond ETF - April 2030: no portfolio disclosed for Bharat Bond ETF - April 2030 |
| Bharat Bond ETF - April 2030Other ETFs | Bharat Bond ETF - April 2030 and Nippon India ETF Nifty India Consumption: no portfolio disclosed for Bharat Bond ETF - April 2030 | Bharat Bond ETF - April 2030 and ICICI Prudential Nifty 50 ETF: no portfolio disclosed for Bharat Bond ETF - April 2030 | Bharat Bond ETF - April 2030 and Nippon India Silver ETF: no portfolio disclosed for Bharat Bond ETF - April 2030 | Bharat Bond ETF - April 2030 and SBI BSE SENSEX ETF: no portfolio disclosed for Bharat Bond ETF - April 2030 | itself |
Closest pair: ICICI Prudential Nifty 50 ETF and SBI BSE SENSEX ETF share 83% of their portfolios. Holding both is closer to holding one twice than to diversifying.
Bharat Bond ETF - April 2030 has no portfolio on file, so its row is blank rather than zero — that is an absence in our data, not a finding about the fund.
Read a cell as: of everything the two funds hold, this much is the same holding at the same weight. It is symmetric — the pair above the diagonal and the pair below it are one number shown twice. A pair at 0% holds nothing in common, which is a real answer, and often the useful one.
Side by side
record, cost, returns, drawdown, size
| Measure | Nippon India ETF Nifty India Consumption | ICICI Prudential Nifty 50 ETF | Nippon India Silver ETF | SBI BSE SENSEX ETF | Bharat Bond ETF - April 2030 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Category | Other ETFs | Other ETFs | Other ETFs | Other ETFs | Other ETFs |
| Fund house | Nippon Life India Asset Management Limited | ICICI Prudential Asset Management Company Limited | Nippon Life India Asset Management Limited | SBI Funds Management Limited | Edelweiss Asset Management Limited |
| Share of three-year stretches it beat its category P4 | 56% of 109 | 28% of 109 | 85% of 20 | 21% of 109 | 0% of 46 |
| Regular plan costs more than Direct by, a year P5 | not measured | not measured | not measured | not measured | not measured |
| Portfolio turned over a year P1 | 32% | 32% | not measured | 31% | not measured |
| Run by P7 | Jitendra Tolani · 1.5 yrs | Nishit Patel · 5.7 yrs | Vikram Dhawan · 4.5 yrs | Viral Chhadva · 7 mo | not known |
| 1-year return | −7.5% | −6.1% | 74.8% | −8.0% | 4.9% |
| 3 years p.a. | 11.2% | 7.1% | 46.3% | 5.3% | 7.5% |
| 5 years p.a. | 10.6% | 7.1% | — | 6.1% | 6.5% |
| Deepest fall (max drawdown) | −21.9% | −15.4% | −44.4% | −16.1% | −1.1% |
| Assets (AUM) | ₹200 Cr | ₹44,570 Cr | ₹30,898 Cr | ₹1.22 lakh Cr | ₹24,942 Cr |
| Disclosed history | 12 yrs | 12 yrs | 4.6 yrs | 5.8 yrs | — |
| Holdings · top ten weight | 33 · 60% | 52 · 53% | 4 · 100% | 32 · 64% | none disclosed |
Funds in different categories are not comparable on returns — a category error is the first thing the postulates refuse to make. Compare each to its own category on its fund page.